I reviewed this article as 'Surface Level' because the article provides almost no new information. It appears to be mostly a headline to draw in readers even though they have very little to no information worth presenting at this time. With that said, there are a few small takeaways in the article and it is accurate in the bits and fragments that it does state.

Yes, this article is surface level stuff but it IS valid and verifiably correct material. Also, it is useful information for people who might not have been paying that much attention to this issue.

yes it is Surface Level to some degree

The information is apparently accurate, but it is certainly surface-level. It didn't provide any new information. The headline is misleading, because we don't know what it is they're actually going to do. Of course, they will provide new details. That doesn't really mean anything.

"He said US policy had not changed on sanctions imposed after Russia seized Crimea, and, asked about Moscow’s interference in US elections, said" Referring to allegations as fact without any context surrounding these issues is merely repeating the official western narrative. Funny how everyone see's this as surface level yet doesn't see the need to question the lack of context surrounding the allegations. We can't afford to allow one sided reporting to like this to continue. How can people draw logical conclusions when they are denied both sides of the issues ? Stating one side of the issue's stance without even mentioning the other side's view is basically saying Russia must be both wrong and guilty when at one point in the piece the author actually admits "alleged" meddling in elections while ignoring the west's interference in Russian elections in the 90's as well as it's covert operations leading up to the ordeal in Ukraine or our involvement in funding "moderate rebels"(cough, cough) in Syria. You don't have to try very hard to write with some actual fact and present both sides fairly enough to allow the reader to decide who to believe. Unfortunately this is not the case in this piece.

Stephen Last Name Stephen Last Name Stephen Last Name Stephen Last Name \Stephen Last Name Stephen Last NameStephen Last Name Stephen Last Name