J6 Committee Is Using Americans' Assertion Of Rights As Proof Of Guilt
U.S. · POLITICS · MEDIA
July 12, 20229 min read1801 words
Published: July 12, 2022  |  9 min read1801 words
Implying guilt based on a witness asserting his rights ‘is a McCarthy-esque tactic that offends the Constitution and is unworthy of the United States Congress.’ShareThe Jan. 6 Committee is abusing its power by asking inappropriate questions about their fellow Americans’ beliefs a...
J6 Committee Is Using Americans' Assertion Of Rights As Proof Of Guilt Read more

No article scores yet.

There are no critic or public scores for this article yet.
Great Context1
critic reviews: 0
public reviews: 1
No reviews
img-contested
N/A
critic score
2 reviews
img-trusted
75%
public score
8 reviews
img-contested
N/A
critic score
0 reviews
img-contested
N/A
public score
2 reviews

CRITIC REVIEWS

There don't seem to be any reviews yet.

PUBLIC REVIEWS

Great Context
July 16, 2022
It is a long read from legal opinion that seems reasonable, but in this era, what is reason? The article makes this reader think there is sound constitutional distress caused by the January Sixth Committee. A lot of detail about proper procedure, conduct, and standard practice is shared. Content includes arguments, background, and common practice outside of the arbitrary behavior of the committee to give the reader a clear picture of the government violating rights of citizens on full display.
July 16, 2022
Is this helpful?