When I first found this article, no subtext was given to the headline (and no indication that it was satirical.) While it is shown that this article is a satire, I give it negative remarks for not being more openly apparent. (Thought: How many news apps has this become a main story on, and how many people just read headlines... could've been easily mistaken for true information.)

This poorly labeled article is not helping the perpetuation of the fake news narrative across the country.

In a world full of so called "fake news" and partisan misinformation, I find the entire concept of a New Yorker satire section unnecessary. If they are going to continue this section, they must make it absolutely clear that it is satire. With that said, for the politically-charged punch that it's trying to throw, it is quite funny.

This is part of the New Yorker's satire section. It's not actual news.

Yeah, this is satire. Admittedly, I lost my mind with the first few sentences and then quickly realized it must be satire. And I love this. Praise be, Borowitz. What’s scary, however, is that things are so crazy right now enough of me thought this could be true that I was duped for even a second.

Given everything that's happened over the past three years, I wouldn't doubt it. I'm giving this a credible rating and I'm fully expecting another oval office to be built - nuzzled up against the primary or now secondary oval office. Two heads are better than one, they always say.