Name: Is it true climate change will cause the end of civilisation by 2050?
Brand: newscientist.com
SKU: newscientist-com-107
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Is it true climate change will cause the end of civilisation by 2050?

preview

×Climate change could bring about the end of civilisation as we know it within three decades, an Australian think tank has warned. by Breakthrough, endorsed by a retired Australian admiral, says a war-time response is needed to avoid the doomsday scenario. “The report speaks, in our opinion, a harsh but necessary truth,” says co-author David Spratt.What does the report say we are in for?The authors sketch a scenario where by 2050 more than half of the world’s population faces 20 days a year of lethal heat, crop yields globally drop by a fifth, the Amazon ecosystem collapses, the Arctic is ice-free in summer, and sea levels have risen by 0.5 metres (they ). In the worst case, “the scale of destruction is beyond our capacity to model, with a high likelihood of human civilisation coming to an end.”The report says more than a billion people could be displaced by climate change by 2050, is that true?The figure is a lot higher than . The , for example. Breakthrough cites as evidence a by a Swedish non-profit, which in turn sourced it from . That said a billion people live in areas that could be inundated by sea level rises this century – quite different to saying there will be a billion climate migrants by 2050.&nbsp;Pratt also referred to a which says: “Unless we change the way we manage our land, in the next 30 years we may leave a billion or more vulnerable poor people with little choice but to fight or flee.”AdvertisementHasn’t the world committed to stop nightmare impacts by limiting temperature rises to 2°C?Yes, it did in the 2015 Paris climate accord, though the plans that countries have put forward for cutting emissions would still still see us . But Breakthrough says warming will be much higher because the number does not include long-term carbon cycle feedback loops (). The think tank explored these views more fully in .Why does this all sound a lot worse than the reports by the UN climate science panel?Reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have an inherent degree of conservatism built into them, , but also because the summaries of the reports have to be signed off by governments. Breakthrough says the IPCC is not paying enough attention to processes that can lead “to system feedbacks, compound extreme events, and abrupt and/or irreversible changes.”What do other researchers think about the claims?Mark Maslin of University College London says the report adds to the deep concerns expressed by security experts over climate change. “Maybe, just may, it is time for our politicians to be worried and start to act to avoid the scenarios painted so vividly,” he says.Does anyone disagree?Michael Mann of Pennsylvania State University says the report is overblown rhetoric. “I respect the authors and appreciate that their intentions are good, but as I have , overblown rhetoric, exaggeration, and unsupportable doomist framing can be counteractive to climate action.” Spratt denies the report is overblown.Can we stop these doomsday predictions coming to pass?Yes but we must reverse emissions, . Spratt says there are “plenty of signs” from citizens around the world that they would like to see a war-like response to climate change, pointing to the and . Maslin says the report is a “stark warning that we must act now.” Spratt acknowledges that countries may also ratchet up their ambition at next year.More on these topics:AdvertisementTrendingLatestVideoFree

×Climate change could bring about the end of civilisation as we know it within three decades, an Australian think tank has warned. by Breakthrough, endorsed by a retired Australian admiral, says a war-time response is needed to avoid the doomsday scenario. “The report speaks, in our opinion, a harsh but necessary truth,” says co-author David Spratt.What does the report say we are in for?The authors sketch a scenario where by 2050 more than half of the world’s population faces 20 days a year of lethal heat, crop yields globally drop by a fifth, the Amazon ecosystem collapses, the Arctic is...

public

#author.fullName}

Adam Vaughan

The best place to find out what’s new in science – and why it matters.

newscientist.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

Is it true climate change will cause the end of civilisation by 2050?

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS