Name: A repeat of the 2016 polling error would see Biden win with a 342 electoral vote landslide
Brand: fortune.com
SKU: fortune-com-97
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

A repeat of the 2016 polling error would see Biden win with a 342 electoral vote landslide

preview

·October 26, 2020, 2:16 PM UTCOur mission to help you navigate the new normal is fueled by subscribers. To enjoy unlimited access to our journalism,&nbsp;.In 2016, Hillary Clinton went into Election Day leading Donald Trump in the RealClearPolitics poll average in (+1.9 percentage points), (+3.4 points), and (+6.5 points). Trump would go on to win all three states —a polling error that shocked the world. This time around, Democratic nominee Joe Biden also leads poll averages in (+8.1 points), (+5.3 points), and (+4.6 points). But it doesn’t stop there. In all, Biden is leading in seven states Trump won four years ago, including (+2.4 points), (+1.5 points), (+0.8 points), and (+1.2 points). Trump holds narrow leads in (0.4 points), (0.6 points), and (2.6 points).But what’s the result if the polling error in 2020 is identical to that in 2016? To find out, Fortune used RealClearPolitics 2016 poll averages to calculate polling errors in 14 battleground states. Then we applied those 2016 state polling errors to states’ 2020 RealClearPolitics poll averages.The result? Biden would win in a 342 electoral vote landslide.* In that scenario, he’d pull out narrow victories in four states Trump won five years ago, including Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Texas. Trump would take Iowa, Georgia, North Carolina, Ohio, and Wisconsin—which had a 7.2 point polling error in 2016.How is it possible for Biden to take Texas, yet at the same time Trump snags Wisconsin? While in 2016, Trump significantly outperformed his Midwest polls, he actually fared worse in Southwest states like Arizona, Nevada, and Texas. Trump led Clinton by a poll average of —a state Clinton would win by 2.4 points. And in 2016, Trump’s only translated to a 9.0 point win. If you apply that 3.0 polling error to Trump’s current , it would translate into a 0.4 point Biden win in the Lone Star State.But this scenario—despite the massive electoral vote tally—wouldn’t be the Biden runaway it appears. Applying a 2016 polling average, Biden would narrowly win Florida (0.5 points), Minnesota (1.3 points), and Texas (0.4 points). Those states account for 77 electoral votes. It takes 270 to win.Keep in mind that while state polling was off by a lot four years ago, national polling was fairly accurate: Clinton had a , and she finished with a 2.1 point popular vote&nbsp;win. This time, nationally . If Biden beats Trump in the popular vote by 6 percentage points, his chances of winning the election are 99%, . But if it’s only a popular vote win of 1 to 2 percentage points, Biden’s chance of an electoral college win drops to 22%.As of Monday, the odds of Biden winning at 88%, while the Democratic nominee having a 94% chance of winning the electoral college.

·October 26, 2020, 2:16 PM UTCOur mission to help you navigate the new normal is fueled by subscribers. To enjoy unlimited access to our journalism,&nbsp;.In 2016, Hillary Clinton went into Election Day leading Donald Trump in the RealClearPolitics poll average in (+1.9 percentage points), (+3.4 points), and (+6.5 points). Trump would go on to win all three states —a polling error that shocked the world. This time around, Democratic nominee Joe Biden also leads poll averages in (+8.1 points), (+5.3 points), and (+4.6 points). But it doesn’t stop there. In all, Biden is leading in seven...

public

Lance Lambert

Defining design, arresting photography, and award-winning writing for those who want to succeed in business and in life.

fortune.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

A repeat of the 2016 polling error would see Biden win with a 342 electoral vote landslide

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS