Name: The New War on Merit
Brand: freebeacon.com
SKU: freebeacon-com-92
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

The New War on Merit

preview

ADVERTISEMENTThe left calls for racial quotas in the name of progress&nbsp;SHAREThe American dream is that any citizen, regardless of sex, race, creed, or color, can rise on his determination and merit. History is littered with examples of the reformers who worked to realize that dream, pushing the most influential institutions in the country to prize talent and hard work over wealth and connections.The introduction of standardized testing, accessible to all American teens, was part of that push. Harvard University began administering a standardized test to all applicants in 1905. profound and immediate: historically a landing spot for the Protestant upper crust, the school began admitting far more public school kids, Catholics, and Jews.The increasing number of Jewish students was a major concern for Harvard president and A. Lawrence Lowell. He tried to implement a quota on Jews, then pivoted to an admissions process that used intangible factors such as "character" and "manliness." It worked: Jewish applicants consistently fell short.These sorts of hazy, intangible assessments are now championed by the left. In the name of racial equality, the woke now seek to dismantle meritocratic norms and return to the quota systems that practices like standardized testing were designed to relegate to the trash heap of history.In a lawsuit likely headed for the Supreme Court, hundreds of would-be Asian admittees allege that Harvard caps their numbers with quotas based on "personality"—an eerie echo of Lowell’s method for keeping out Jews.The New York Times’s classical music critic, Anthony Tommasini, the end of the blind symphony audition, which a tripling of women's representation in the field, so that conductors can make race-based selections. The University of Connecticut School of Medicine, where merit is literally a matter of life or death, admissions to its honor society because the GPA-based admissions criterion did not produce an honor society that, as Bill Clinton said, "looked like America."The SAT—which intellect better and more fairly than do intangible heuristics—is under fire. University of California president and former Obama official Janet Napolitano the chorus of administrators at elite universities who complain that race-blind admissions aren’t producing the desired results.Those calling for "progress" usually want to forfeit someone else's job. Tommasini is a white man, as are all his colleagues at the Times‘s "music" section. So is the L.A. Times's Mark Swed, and Washington Post music critic Michael Brodeur, who recently penned a about classical music's "long overdue reckoning with racism."All are curiously quiet on the "racism" of their clique. None seem ready to give up their own position for indigenous or trans critics, who surely exist! Surely they are waiting somewhere for the call from the New York Times that their turn has come, merit be damned!As the Times‘s&nbsp;own Ross Douthat , those who stand to benefit most from this new attitude are the rich and powerful, who will be free to clear the way for their underachieving kids—the Varsity Blues scandal, legitimated by wokeness.The new war on merit is the same as the old, and it marks regression rather than progress. It's straight out of Lowell's playbook: In the name of "equality," tear down the only system we have that gives the talented a shot over the powerful.Published under:Next Article

ADVERTISEMENTThe left calls for racial quotas in the name of progress&nbsp;SHAREThe American dream is that any citizen, regardless of sex, race, creed, or color, can rise on his determination and merit. History is littered with examples of the reformers who worked to realize that dream, pushing the most influential institutions in the country to prize talent and hard work over wealth and connections.The introduction of standardized testing, accessible to all American teens, was part of that push. Harvard University began administering a standardized test to all applicants in 1905. profound...

public

washington-free-beacon-editors

Washington Free Beacon Editors

freebeacon.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

The New War on Merit

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS