Name: Harvard and MIT Sue Trump Administration | Law & Crime
Brand: lawandcrime.com
SKU: lawandcrime-com-302
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Harvard and MIT Sue Trump Administration | Law & Crime

preview

Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on Wednesday asked a federal judge to stop the Trump administration from enforcing a new policy barring international students from remaining in the U.S. to attend colleges and universities offering only online courses for the fall semester. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, argues that the measure is defective as an abuse of discretion and a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). “The order came down without notice—its cruelty surpassed only by its recklessness,” Harvard’s President Lawrence S. Bacow wrote in an email to affiliates, according to . “We believe that the ICE order is bad public policy, and we believe that it is illegal.” In light of the deadly pandemic, the administration in March issued an exemption to student visa rules that normally require holders to attend most of their classes in person. The exemption permitted foreign students to telecommute to their classes while maintaining their visa status. According to the filed complaint, the administration’s decision to reverse its preexisting policy on Monday—suddenly stripping foreign students of their visas—was part of a larger effort to pressure schools across the country to reopen classrooms despite the still surging global pandemic.“By all appearances, ICE’s decision reflects an effort by the federal government to force universities to reopen in-person classes,” the complaint stated, adding, “the effect—and perhaps even the goal—is to create as much chaos for universities and international students as possible.” “ICE’s rescission of that recognition failed to consider numerous weighty interests, and is itself arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion. Further, ICE’s action is procedurally defective under the Administrative Procedure Act, ” the complaint continued. ” It should be set aside, and the government required to abide by the guidance it put forward in March and on which universities and students relied in planning a fall semester during an ongoing pandemic.” The lawsuit specifically names the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the agency’s Acting Secretary Chad Wolf, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the agency’s Acting Director Matthew Albence. Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey&nbsp;(D) on Tuesday also promised to take legal action to protect international students against what she called a “cruel” and “illegal” act. “Not on my watch. This is just another cruel (&amp; illegal) attempt by the Trump Admin &amp; ICE to stir up uncertainty &amp; punish immigrants,” Healy tweeted. “Our state is home to thousands of international students who shouldn’t fear deportation or health risks in order to get an education. We will sue.” It’s worth noting that the Trump administration has There’s also a tweet: Read the full complaint below: by on Scribd [image via Scott Eisen_Getty Images] Tags: , , , , , ,

Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology on Wednesday asked a federal judge to stop the Trump administration from enforcing a new policy barring international students from remaining in the U.S. to attend colleges and universities offering only online courses for the fall semester. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, argues that the measure is defective as an abuse of discretion and a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). “The order came down without notice—its cruelty surpassed only by its recklessness,” Harvard’s President...

public

Jerry Lambe

Law, Crime, LIVE Trials and Smart Legal Analysis.

lawandcrime.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

Harvard and MIT Sue Trump Administration | Law & Crime

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS