I think Bloomberg is almost always nothing but essentially factual. Its only bias is towards business which is what it's reporting on. I didn't see anything in the article that countered what seemed to be the facts. The article doesn't talk about the larger context of international global trade agreements, but that wasn't the scope of the article.

This article fairly points out the reasons for Harley-Davidson’s decision. Although some might see it as biased, the trade war the president has started is, in fact, the main cause of this decision. The article is well-written and walks a nice, fine and balanced line of trying to stay objective.

Good job of presenting the issues as they apply to Harley. Too bad it skims over the larger issue of the toxic pill that is the TPP, TTIP, and TISA. This is yet another wedge issue designed to confuse people into giving in to corporate control via these mislabeled "trade" deals which have more to do with control over society than actual trade law. There's good reason they were kept as a secret from the majority of people who have only their labor to sell in order to make a living. In the end these stories are really conflating a complex problem with a binary choice of jobs vs "free trade" which is code for complete corporate control via corporate courts with power over sovereign nations or a proto-feudalism.