This article remains objective until the final paragraph, at which point it loosely throws around accusations and tries to attach Tarantino to the recently disgraced Harvey Weinstein- simply because they've worked together as titans in Hollywood(as would be expected). As for the Uma Thurman issues, the author leaves out that Tarantino spit on Uma during a scene that had her being spit on because as director he wanted the shot done a specific way. Would it have been better to pay someone else to spit on her instead? Also, Tarantino has apologized for encouraging Uma to do her own driving stunt that resulted in her injury, but obviously Uma acted of her own will and was not "forced" as the author claims. Author Andrew Pulver had my 'Trust' until this final paragraph where he decided to sensationalize the production of a Manson film that shouldn't be controversial- because it's a true story that’s worth exploring, as most great films are.

An article like this makes me wonder who the editor might be. The last paragraph had nothing to do with the title and left a bad taste in my mouth as to why this paragraph was even needed. The information leading up to this would have suited, and would have been trusted.