An investigative, but based basically on one source, look at the referenced matter. The Author is not without her biases, and it shows. The sourcing is helpful but primarily confirms the seemingly predetermined conclusion. The outlet is credible as is most of the statistical data provided. However, the piece lacks balance, which is to its detriment. The opinionative speculation sprinkled about is clearly on display. All in all an only nominally interesting and worthwhile read, if you have the time. Important note to prospective readers: The referenced "Forbes' list" is considered in some quarters to be unreliable as to the information it provides due to, amongst other reasons, it's said to be shoddy methodology.