Voices of Dissent Fall Victim to Twitter’s Now Permanent Ban Hammer
U.S. · TECH · MEDIA
November 18, 20195 min read1045 words
Published: November 18, 2019  |  5 min read1045 words
Voices of Dissent Fall Victim to Twitter’s Now Permanent Ban Hammer Read more

Scores for this article.

Percentage of critic and public trust in this article.
Lack of Reliable Sources3
img-contested
N/A
critic score
critic reviews: 1
img-contested
0%
public score
public reviews: 4
img-contested
N/A
critic score
2 reviews
img-trusted
69%
public score
35 reviews
img-contested
N/A
critic score
1 reviews
img-contested
43%
public score
7 reviews

CRITIC REVIEWS

Lack of Reliable Sources
November 23, 2019
An act of literary conjuring camouflaged as investigative journalism. In actuality though, as is almost always the case with the conspiratorially minded, rife with paranoia in style and substance, such as there is. The piece consists primarily of conjectural foreplay, ephemeral as the ether. It would serve the prospective reader well to also take note of the outlandish and presumptive nature of the proffered conclusion. Not a worthwhile read.
November 23, 2019
Is this helpful?

PUBLIC REVIEWS

Lack of Reliable Sources
November 19, 2019
A fabrication to rival 9-11 conspiracies, except with more details and less evidence to push the fallacy.
November 19, 2019
Is this helpful?
Political Agenda
November 18, 2019
Trying to push a narrative that does not exist. This is an Op Ed with nary a single source.
November 18, 2019
Is this helpful?
Lack of Reliable Sources
November 23, 2019
This article is a total fabrication lacking in credible sources. This type of article is part of the disinformation wave across the internet.
November 23, 2019
Is this helpful?
Sensational
November 19, 2019
My issue with this article is with the sensationalism and speculation at the beginning where it references Twitter hiring a "senior editorial executive for Europe, the Middle East and Africa is an active officer in the British Army’s 77th Brigade, a unit dedicated to online warfare and psychological operations." To me, it's more likely that Twitter hired this individual to help secure Twitter and keep disinformation campaigns off of the platform. It's the same as a company hiring a professional hacker. THey're not doing it so the hacker can compromise their system, they're doing it so the hacker can use his or her blackhat skills to test the integrity of the platform.
November 19, 2019
Is this helpful?