Name: Coronavirus: Malaria drug hydroxychloroquine 'does not save lives'
Brand: bbc.co.uk
SKU: bbc-co-uk-656
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Coronavirus: Malaria drug hydroxychloroquine 'does not save lives'

preview

A malaria drug that has been tested as a treatment for coronavirus does not save lives, one of the world's largest trials shows.Hydroxychloroquine received global attention after being promoted by Donald Trump, and then controversy after studies on it were retracted.The drug has now been pulled from , which is run by the University of Oxford.The findings have been passed on to the World Health Organization.Back at the start of the pandemic, laboratory studies had suggested the malaria drug could affect the virus. Small-scale studies in China and France then hinted it might help patients.There was a huge amount of hope, as the medicine is cheap and has been safely used to treat malaria and conditions such as lupus and arthritis.However, the evidence supporting its use for coronavirus has been weak.That is why the data from the Recovery trial is crucial. It is the first to test the drug in large numbers of people in a thorough clinical trial.More than 11,000 patients with Covid-19 are taking part, with 1,542 patients given hydroxychloroquine. Due to mounting controversy about the drug, the UK's drugs regulator last night asked the Oxford researchers to review their data. The results showed 25.7% of people taking hydroxychloroquine had died after 28 days. This compared with 23.5% who were given standard hospital treatment. "This is not a treatment for Covid," said Prof Martin Landray, part of the Recovery trial. The trial immediately stopped using the drug. The findings come in the wake of deep concern in academic publishing that led to an article being retracted - one of the world's most prestigious medical journals.It had published a study involving nearly 15,000 patients, from hundreds of hospitals, given hydroxycholoroquine or the similar drug chloroquine. It concluded the drug was not beneficial and increased the risk of irregular heart rhythms and death. That publication led to the WHO suspending its trials of the anti-malaria drug.The data had been collected from hospitals by the little-known healthcare firm Surgisphere. Concerns were raised about the data and then some of the study's authors said they could no longer stand by their publication as Surgisphere would not allow an independent review.Then retracted another paper that had data based on Surgisphere. Prof Peter Horby, from the University of Oxford which runs the Recovery trial, said: "Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have received a lot of attention and have been used very widely to treat Covid patients despite the absence of any good evidence. "Although it is disappointing that this treatment has been shown to be ineffective, it does allow us to focus care and research on more promising drugs."Follow on Twitter.View comments

A malaria drug that has been tested as a treatment for coronavirus does not save lives, one of the world's largest trials shows.Hydroxychloroquine received global attention after being promoted by Donald Trump, and then controversy after studies on it were retracted.The drug has now been pulled from , which is run by the University of Oxford.The findings have been passed on to the World Health Organization.Back at the start of the pandemic, laboratory studies had suggested the malaria drug could affect the virus. Small-scale studies in China and France then hinted it might help...

public

BBCNews

Presenter of Inside Health on  @BBCRadio4  and health and science correspondent,  @BBCNews .  Contrary to popular opinion my middle name is not Tiberius.

James Gallagher

 News, features and analysis. For world news, follow  @BBCWorld . Breaking news, follow  @BBCBreaking . Latest sport news  @BBCSport . Our Instagram: BBCNews

bbc.co.uk

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

Coronavirus: Malaria drug hydroxychloroquine 'does not save lives'

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS