Local Officials Want to Remove Confederate Monuments—but States Won't Let Them
August 25, 201711 min read2212 words
Published: August 25, 2017  |  11 min read2212 words
Leaders in the city of Birmingham, Alabama, had long looked askance at the Confederate monument in Linn Park, a granite obelisk soaring more than 50 feet in the air near downtown. In a city with a and a nearly 75 percent African American population, the memorial seemed like a pro...
Local Officials Want to Remove Confederate Monuments—but States Won't Let Them Read more

Scores for this article.

Percentage of critic and public trust in this article.
Credible6
img-contested
N/A
critic score
critic reviews: 0
img-trusted
100%
public score
public reviews: 6
img-trusted
94%
critic score
117 reviews
img-trusted
78%
public score
125 reviews
img-contested
N/A
critic score
2 reviews
img-trusted
73%
public score
11 reviews

CRITIC REVIEWS

There don't seem to be any reviews yet.

PUBLIC REVIEWS

Credible
August 26, 2017
Very interesting, balanced, and well written article that lays down pros and cons of letting people tear down confederate monuments. The author, David A. Graham, takes the time to research and expose both sides of the argument, quoting politicians on the issue, and underlining how delicate the subject is. Very good read.
August 26, 2017
Is this helpful?
Credible
August 25, 2017
Well documented coverage of the issues associated with local attempts to remove Confederate memorials. It explains in excellent detail how it is that these memorials continue to stand despite there being increasing interest by localities for having them removed. Despite its thorough coverage, it didn't address a couple key related issues. Name, the issue of states rights versus the rights of municipalities is a bit more complicated than represented in this article. In this case, it appears clear that the state lawmakers have infringed on local government but if the topic was about something else a locality wanted to do (e.g. erect a Confederate memorial rather than take one down),one might not feel the same about applying those state controls so I wish that issue had been teased out a bit more. Also, the issue of erasing history versus celebrating racist traitors (which is technically what most of the Confederate leaders would be considered in today's context) isn't tackled really at all.
August 25, 2017
Is this helpful?
Credible
August 25, 2017
A balanced look at current obstacles preventing local citizens from deciding whether confederate statues can be removed or not
August 25, 2017
Is this helpful?
Credible
August 25, 2017
David A. Graham provides a thorough and detailed picture of views from all parties involved in the current decision to keep or tear down Confederate Statues. Sourcing quotes from the State, Municipal, UNC, and local communities, David provides context before suggesting his own opinion on how either parties might proceed and what consequences might come about depending on what they choose. I really enjoyed this article because it gave all the necessary information for the reader to make their own decision on the politically, racially, and emotionally charged issue of today.
August 25, 2017
Is this helpful?
Credible
August 25, 2017
Very cool article, showing the different perspectives of the social conflict currently going on in the South. Good reporting!
August 25, 2017
Is this helpful?
Credible
August 25, 2017
Interesting article. It highlights the many laws that prohibit local governments from taking action. They are trying to do what they think is right, but their hands are tied. I can see why the laws were put there in the first place, but once again too much state and federal government involvement in local affairs.
August 25, 2017
Is this helpful?