September 17, 20193 min read, 574 words
Published: September 17, 2019 | 3 min read, 574 words
Judge Andrew Napolitano breaks down the big legal issues raised by the controversial New York Times report on the Supreme Court justice.You can now listen to Fox News articles!suggested this week that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh The New York Times for libel after ...
CRITIC REVIEWS
Balanced
September 17, 2019
A well-written, well-sourced overview of the referenced issue. While this particular publishing outlet is normally associated with a specific political bent, in this case a balanced approach is taken and should be appreciated by the reader. Prospective readers will also note that while brief the piece does add contextually to the broader discussion of the matter at hand in some political circles.
September 17, 2019
PUBLIC REVIEWS
Balanced
September 17, 2019
Although Fox news is well known for being squarely on the conservative side, apart from the clickbait headline, they do appear to provide both sides of the issue.
September 17, 2019
Balanced
September 20, 2019
I thought they presented the requirements for slander well and didn't spend too much time on the article itself. The article has been discussed already so moving on to whether a SCJ would and/or could go after the NYT was interesting.
September 20, 2019
Balanced
September 18, 2019
There are good sources for the quotes, and several sources are cited. The article discusses both possible outcomes for the case, and the experts weighing in provide their interpretation of the situation and give the reader a possible likelihood of a positive or negative outcome.
September 18, 2019
Balanced
September 18, 2019
This a good overview of the NY Times' piece on Kavanaugh and whether or not the reporting warrants legal pushback from Kavanaugh himself. I found this piece to be well-balanced in its criticisms of the NY Times and Kavanaugh's available actions.
September 18, 2019