Name: The NY Times Used to Correct Its Whoppers. But Not These Two. Here's Why. | RealClearInvestigations
Brand: realclearinvestigations.com
SKU: realclearinvestigations-com-3
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

The NY Times Used to Correct Its Whoppers. But Not These Two. Here's Why. | RealClearInvestigations

preview

ByXStory Streamrecent articlesUpdate, May 4, 2020:&nbsp;Nikole Hannah-Jones was for her lead work on the disputed "1619 Project" discussed in this essay.The New York Times is widely admired for owning up to its errors. In addition to the corrections it runs each day, it has a tradition of publishing extensive Editor’s Notes and even full-length investigations when it has determined that flawed reporting misled readers and botched the rough first draft of history. Since 2000, these have included lengthy reassessments of its reporting on whether a Chinese American scientist, , had...

public

 RealClearInvestigations is your source for in-depth and consequential investigative reporting on any subject, in any medium. Part of RealClear Media Group.

realclearinvestigations.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

The NY Times Used to Correct Its Whoppers. But Not These Two. Here's Why. | RealClearInvestigations

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS