Name: GOP lawsuit to block Tony Evers' order to stay home in hands of Supreme Court
Brand: jsonline.com
SKU: jsonline-com-38
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

GOP lawsuit to block Tony Evers' order to stay home in hands of Supreme Court

preview

Milwaukee Journal SentinelMADISON - Gov. Tony Evers and his administration&nbsp;came under fire Tuesday by conservative justices on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, one of whom compared his order to close businesses and schools amid the coronavirus outbreak to government oppression.&nbsp;"Isn't it the very definition of tyranny for one person to order people to be imprisoned for going to work among other ordinarily lawful activities?" asked Justice Rebecca Bradley, who later questioned whether the administration could use the same power to order people into centers akin to the U.S. government's treatment of Japanese Americans during World War II.A lawsuit brought by Republican lawmakers against Evers and Department of Health Secretary Andrea Palm seeking to strike down the order is now in the hands of the state's highest court, which is controlled by conservatives.&nbsp;Evers and his attorney said Tuesday the lawmakers' lawsuit could upend life-saving measures and needlessly put more residents' health — and their lives —&nbsp;at risk."Everyone understands such an order would be absolutely devastating and extraordinarily unwise," DOJ attorney Colin Roth said. "If safer-at-home (order) is enjoined with nothing to replace it, and people pour out into the streets, that the disease will spread like wildfire and we'll be back in a terrible situation with an out-of-control virus with no weapon to fight it — no treatments, no vaccine, nothing."In response to Bradley's questioning, Roth said the order does not give Palm unlimited power. But&nbsp;Bradley questioned&nbsp;whether the law set limits to the actions it allowed.&nbsp;Live updates:Daily digest:Evers issued a public health emergency on March 12, a week after the coronavirus began to spread in the state following outbreaks in China, Europe, and on the coasts of the United States.The governor in late March issued an order to shut down scores of businesses, bars and restaurants, and schools — leading to more than 500,000 unemployment claims since then.&nbsp;That order was set to expire in late April but Evers and Palm extended it by a month as cases of the virus continued to climb — a move that prompted GOP lawmakers to sue.&nbsp;Arguments in the suit were held virtually on Tuesday&nbsp;— a rule adopted by the court because of the order it now will decide should continue.&nbsp;&nbsp;The lawsuit is the latest battle between the Democratic governor and Republicans who control the state Legislature that could again reshape how state government works for Wisconsin.&nbsp;At issue is whether Evers and&nbsp;Department of Health Secretary Andrea Palm acted lawfully when Palm signed the order extending restrictions on business operations and schools until May 26.Palm signed the order using powers in state law that allow the health secretary to take sweeping actions to shutdown public life&nbsp;during a virus outbreak like the current pandemic.&nbsp;&nbsp;Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, who is running for Congress in the 5th District, and Speaker Robin Vos argue the Evers administration cannot act on its own in perpetuity and instead want a long-term plan to be crafted through the Legislature's rulemaking process."This case is not about whether a lockdown is a good idea,"&nbsp;Ryan Walsh, an attorney representing the lawmakers, said Tuesday. Instead, he argued, the case is about whether state law provides Palm with the ability to close down daily life.&nbsp;Roth argued state law is clear and that if conservative justices or GOP lawmakers are unhappy with her powers, they should find a solution through legislation to change the law that he says provides those powers.&nbsp;If the court sides with Fitzgerald and Vos, a legislative committee with three of the most critical lawmakers of the Evers administration's response to the virus outbreak will have veto power over the new rules.&nbsp;The GOP leaders argue lawmakers should have a say in broad restrictions moving forward. Evers argues the process will bog down decision making that needs to be nimble to react to an unpredictable virus that has infected more than 8,000 people in Wisconsin in two months.&nbsp;Walsh argued DHS had the authority to issue orders for certain areas of the state, but not the state as a whole, while Roth disputed that and said DHS' orders supersede less-stringent orders of local governments.&nbsp;Roth noted while the majority of cases were once in Madison and Milwaukee, Brown County now has the second-highest number of cases — a change that occurred within a couple weeks.&nbsp;Supreme Court Chief Justice Patience Roggensack dismissed the idea that the outbreak was community-wide and could be replicated elsewhere."(The surge) was due to the meatpacking — that's where Brown County got the flare," Roggensack said. "It wasn't just the regular folks in Brown County."Three meatpacking plants in Brown County have been tied to outbreaks, pushing the county to have the second-highest number of cases in the state.&nbsp;JBS Packerland shut down its Green Bay plant last week&nbsp;after the virus had sickened nearly 300 workers, about a quarter of the company's local employees.Even with the microscope on food processing plants, Brown County officials have emphasized that those facilities aren't solely driving the increase&nbsp;in cases.Claire Paprocki of Brown County Health and Human Services said the recent uptick stems&nbsp;in part from people who don't practice social distancing, show up to work sick or continue to gather with family and&nbsp;friends.&nbsp;Haley BeMiller of the Green Bay Press-Gazette contributed to this report.&nbsp;Contact Molly Beck&nbsp;at . Follow her on Twitter at .

Milwaukee Journal SentinelMADISON - Gov. Tony Evers and his administration&nbsp;came under fire Tuesday by conservative justices on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, one of whom compared his order to close businesses and schools amid the coronavirus outbreak to government oppression.&nbsp;"Isn't it the very definition of tyranny for one person to order people to be imprisoned for going to work among other ordinarily lawful activities?" asked Justice Rebecca Bradley, who later questioned whether the administration could use the same power to order people into centers akin to the U.S. government's...

GOP lawsuit to block Tony Evers' order to stay home in hands of Supreme Court

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS