Name: Coronavirus Is Hammering the News Industry. Here’s How to Save It.
Brand: jacobinmag.com
SKU: jacobinmag-com-4
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Coronavirus Is Hammering the News Industry. Here’s How to Save It.

preview

The new issue of Jacobin is out next week. and get a yearlong print and digital subscription.The media landscape in the United States is increasingly grim. In recent weeks, have lost their jobs or had their hours and pay slashed. Newspaper chains are as pick over the remains. With advertising revenues decimated, local news outlets are hollowing out, silencing an important source of information when it’s needed most.But it’s important to understand that commercial journalism, , was collapsing long before COVID-19. The newspaper industry had already shed since the early 2000s. The virus, more an accelerant than a cause, simply kicked over a teetering edifice.The underlying economics are simple, if often obscured. Advertising long provided what was essentially a subsidy for local journalism, a public good that typically can’t pay for itself. It was a lucrative arrangement for many publishers until news moved online, where digital ads pay only fractions of print advertising revenues, thus killing newspapers’ business model. Commercial alternatives like online paywalls have failed to rescue the vast majority of news outlets.These conditions had devastated local journalism long before the pandemic, but newspapers — still Americans’ — are now facing existential doom. While have been , all local journalism is threatened, with many outlets . Losing what little advertising remained from local businesses and events could deliver a to surviving papers. To give one stark example: Cleveland’s the Plain Dealer had 340 journalists twenty years ago. Now it’s .Some analysts Google and Facebook for devouring most digital advertising revenue. But while these firms should be for a host of social harms, identifying monopoly power as the primary source of the journalism crisis misdiagnoses the problem. There’s a deeper pathology at work: capitalism and journalism have always been at odds. It’s time to sever their unholy union.Overreliance on profit-driven news media has always been . Commercial imperatives incentivized news organizations to underserve and misrepresent entire segments of society. The coronavirus is intensifying this . With newspaper closures, bankruptcies, mergers, and extreme downsizing increasingly common, across the country lack access to any local news.To lose the local newspaper is to lose an institution that’s vitally important to the health, culture, and democratic promise of our towns and cities. They are a social necessity, and we must rescue them from the ravages of the market. There’s already movement in this direction, as calls for proliferate. Many of these — subsidizing journalists’ salaries, expanding public broadcasting’s budget, saving outlets from bankruptcy — have been , but they’ve taken on a new resonance as journalism’s plight becomes more urgent.In the short term, the government should intervene to salvage what local public service journalism remains in the commercial sector. As lawmakers shower industry after industry — from cruise ships to hotel chains — with bailouts, we can afford to allocate emergency funds to of the pandemic. Instead of propping up failed commercial models, this public financing should be conditional on newspapers transitioning into nonprofit status.But journalism needs more than just stimulus; it needs a major structural overhaul. And it requires permanent and public support.Massive subsidies for local media could come in many forms. A new Works Progress Administration (WPA)–style program focused on jobs and infrastructure could return legions of unemployed journalists back to their beats and fund the build-out of necessary infrastructure such as networks and public media outlets.Devoting an average of $100 per US citizen to local media infrastructure would add up to more than $30 billion annually (similar to the public media budgets of many Western and Northern European countries and proportionate to US postal subsidies for newspapers in the 1800s). This modest outlay — tiny compared to recent tax cuts for billionaires and corporations — could help maintain a baseline for reliable news and information.For starters, that would mean expanding and repurposing US public broadcasting, which receives just $445 million a year from the federal government (or approximately $1.34/person). By comparison, the US government shells out $700 million annually for international broadcasting services like Voice of America and devotes more than $600 million to the Pentagon’s public relations budget alone.Existing public institutions, including libraries, universities, and public broadcasting stations, could also be harnessed to provide institutional support for local journalism. , which historically has played a vital role in disseminating the news, we could expand it by converting tens of thousands of post offices into community media-making spaces.Subsidizing public media should be uncontroversial, as it is in many countries. To maintain universal information services with diverse views and voices, democratic governments around the world invest in their news media without creating propaganda machines or sliding into authoritarianism.In the past, even the United States has supported media production. During the Great Depression, the government put artists and writers back to work through its WPA programs. And every major communication system — from the to to — flourished thanks to government resources. Media subsidies are as American as apple pie.Of course, political independence is a legitimate concern. But government support doesn’t amount to government control. Oversight must be decentralized and bottom-up, with local communities and journalists setting the tone and content of coverage. These new newsrooms — publicly owned, democratically governed, and fully funded — should look like the neighborhoods they serve, and their focus should be determined by the needs of residents.Letting the market drive journalism into the ground is a political choice. If we harbor any hope for democracy, our communities’ health, or tens of thousands of jobs, we can’t let local journalism wither.If nothing else, this crisis illustrates what happens when we leave public services — from health care to education — dependent on the mercy of the market. We must find a new way to support . The news is a public good, and public goods require public investments. A noncommercial model — owned by and in service to the people — is journalism’s last, best hope.Thanks for signing up!The media landscape in the United States is increasingly grim. In recent weeks, thirty-three thousand news workers have lost their jobs or had their hours and pay slashed. Newspaper chains are going bankrupt as vulture capitalists pick over the remains. With advertising revenues decimated, local news outlets are hollowing out, silencing an important source of […]The media landscape in the United States is increasingly grim. In recent weeks, thirty-three thousand news workers have lost their jobs or had their hours and pay slashed. Newspaper chains are going bankrupt as vulture capitalists pick over the remains. With advertising revenues decimated, local news outlets are hollowing out, silencing an important source of […]The media landscape in the United States is increasingly grim. In recent weeks, thirty-three thousand news workers have lost their jobs or had their hours and pay slashed. Newspaper chains are going bankrupt as vulture capitalists pick over the remains. With advertising revenues decimated, local news outlets are hollowing out, silencing an important source of […]

The new issue of Jacobin is out next week. and get a yearlong print and digital subscription.The media landscape in the United States is increasingly grim. In recent weeks, have lost their jobs or had their hours and pay slashed. Newspaper chains are as pick over the remains. With advertising revenues decimated, local news outlets are hollowing out, silencing an important source of information when it’s needed most.But it’s important to understand that commercial journalism, , was collapsing long before COVID-19. The newspaper industry had already shed since the early 2000s. The virus, more...

public

Victor Pickard is an associate professor of communication at the Annenberg School for Communication. His research focuses on the history and political economy of media institution; media activism; and the politics and normative foundations of media policy. Before coming to Annenberg, he taught at New York University in the media, culture, and communication department. Previously, he worked on media policy in Washington, D.C., as a senior research fellow at the media reform organization Free Press and the New America Foundation, a public policy think tank. He also taught media policy at the University of Virginia and served as a media policy fellow for Representative Diane Watson.

https://www.thenation.com/authors/victor-pickard/

Victor Pickard

Jacobin is a democratic socialist quarterly magazine based in New York offering American leftist perspectives on politics, economics, and culture. Its paid print circulation is 40,000 and its website draws more than a million and a half views a month as of 2019.[2] Noam Chomsky has called the magazine "a bright light in dark times"

Coronavirus Is Hammering the News Industry. Here’s How to Save It.

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS