Name: “Believe Science” Is a Bad Response to Denialism
Brand: newrepublic.com
SKU: newrepublic-com-37
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

“Believe Science” Is a Bad Response to Denialism

preview

public

Kate Aronoff is a staff writer at The New Republic. She is the co-author of A Planet To Win: Why We Need A Green New Deal (Verso) and the co-editor of We Own The Future: Democratic Socialism, American Style (The New Press).

https://newrepublic.com/authors/kate-aronoff

Kate Aronoff

KateAronoff

Founded in 1914, The New Republic is a magazine of interpretation and opinion for a rapidly changing world.

newrepublic.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

“Believe Science” Is a Bad Response to Denialism

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS