Name: Fair Observer - World News, International Politics, Global Economy & Business News
Brand: fairobserver.com
SKU: fairobserver-com-4
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Fair Observer - World News, International Politics, Global Economy & Business News

preview

Back to NewslettersSarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, capital city of Bosnia-Herzegovina pinned on political map.© Below the Sky/ shutterstock.comToday, the war in Ukraine, the attempted coup in Russia and the unrest in France are making the headlines. Still, there is another crisis in Europe happening in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Known for its chronic political instability and dysfunctional institutions, the country is showing more signs of disintegration, encouraged by the West.Similarly to the situation that emerged when former High Representative Valentin Inzko imposed amendments to the criminal code, the present crisis is due to the decisions of the current High Representative in this Balkan country.There are at least two reasons why we should pay attention to this crisis. First, it can potentially escalate, with unpredictable consequences for the region and the continent.Second, it confirms that the proclaimed commitment of many Western governments to democracy, human rights and the rule of law is nothing but propaganda. This propaganda campaign hides the adherence to non-democratic procedures whenever these better serve imperial interests and political-economic goals.On July 1, 2023, the current High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Christian Schmidt, issued a series of legally binding decisions. Schmidt imposed amendments to the criminal code and declared that everyone who does not “apply, implement, enforce or otherwise comply with a decision of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina, or who prevents or otherwise obstructs its application, implementation or enforcement, shall be punished by imprisonment for a term between six months and five years.”In addition, Schmidt issued decisions aimed at nullifying the previously approved laws by the Parliament of Republika Srpska, one of the constitutive entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Parliament had determined not to implement the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the territory of Republika Srpska until the Federal Parliament approves new legislation regarding the Constitutional Court. This would prevent foreigners from illegitimately serving as Constitutional Court justices in the country—which has been the practice since the end of the war in 1995.The perception of the Parliament majority and the leadership of Republika Srpska is that the Constitutional Court lacks legitimacy. They believe that the Constitutional Court has been making unconstitutional decisions that merely reflect the interests of Western political elites, disregarding the vital interests of the Bosnian constitutive entity.The Western press is rightfully reporting on authoritarian leadership in countries like Russia. However, there is a lack of coverage on Bosnia and Herzegovina, where the High Representative, who holds no democratic legitimacy, can overrule decisions made by Parliament, whose members are democratically elected. This power structure is the sad reality of the Western-backed neocolonial rule in Bosnia and Herzegovina.The complicated institutional arrangement of today’s Bosnia and Herzegovina is primarily the result of the Dayton Peace Agreement, which ended the war in the former Yugoslav Republic. Annex 10 of this agreement calls for the establishment of the office of the High Representative. As designated by Annex 10, the High Representative coordinates organizations involved in the civilian aspects of a peace settlement, monitoring and resolving difficulties. The High Representative also participates in donor meetings for rehabilitation and reconstruction.However, the procedure for appointing the High Representative was never clearly defined and lacked transparency from the beginning. The Peace Implementation Conference held in London in December 1995 only&nbsp; “approved the designation of Mr. Carl Bildt as High Representative,” inviting “the United Nations Security Council to agree to Mr. Bildt’s designation as High Representative.”&nbsp;The Conference established the Peace Implementation Council (PIC), where the US-led coalition was the decisive voice that would appoint future High Representatives and influence peace implementations. Originally, the Steering Board of the PIC was supposed to give political guidance on peace implementation to the High Representative. There was an initial attempt to provide newly appointed High Representatives a semblance of legitimacy by submitting the decision to the UN Security Council for approval. However, even this procedure has gone by the wayside.Significant problems started with the “Bonn Powers,” referring to the process of PIC granting more authority to the High Representative. In December 1997, at the PIC meeting in Bonn, the High Representative was authorized to make binding decisions on implementing the Peace Agreement, including measures against officials who “are absent from meetings without good cause” or who are “found by the High Representative to be in violation of legal commitments made under the Peace Agreement or the terms for its implementation.”This vague formula allows for virtually unlimited powers over institutions and procedures in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The High Representative became the supreme legislator and the judge, responsible only to his imperial masters and financiers. The rest of the institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina are supposed to serve as obedient executors and do whatever the neocolonial governor tells them.Based on these extraordinary powers, High Representatives started to overrule the decisions of elected representatives. They also began to annul and change state legislation and decisions made by local authorities, remove democratically elected officials and change state legislation as they found fit.The power of unelected governors, without any democratic legitimacy, undermines the authority of the law approved by legitimate, elected state authorities. Western democracies, of course, do not see a problem, and the mainstream Western media do not report on such abominations within a political system of a European country. Authoritarianism is fine, as long as the autocrats are “our” guys.Some call Bosnia and Herzegovina an epic failure of the West and the US-led coalition to build a sustainable and democratic country after the bloody war of the 1990s. Others see it as a successful case of preventing democratic development, reasoning that the policies and post-war design of Bosnia and Herzegovina were intended to prevent the country from being a functioning state and a meaningful democracy.&nbsp;The territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina remains unstable and is a stage for implementing neo-liberal policies in agreement with corrupt local elites. When there is a crisis initiated or enhanced by imperial policies, the Western empire will act as if they are rescuing people from their tribal leaders who lack sophisticated democratic culture. The lesson that the native population in every colony is supposed to learn is that only (neo)colonial masters can set you free.[Lane Gibson edited this piece.]The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.You can also contribute viaIn this episode of FO° Podcasts, Canadian Defence Attaché Major-General Michel-Henri (Mike) St-Louis speaks to Fair Observer’s Editor-in-Chief Atul Singh...History is always complex, especially in Eastern Europe. One of our authors draws lessons from the collapse of Yugoslavia in...Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ CountriesBecome a MemberFair Observer, 461 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002, USABECOME A MEMBERUnique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ CountriesWe Need Your ConsentThe Fair Observer website uses digital cookies so it can collect statistics on how many visitors come to the site, what content is viewed and for how long, and the general location of the computer network of the visitor. These statistics are collected and processed using the Google Analytics service. Fair Observer uses these aggregate statistics from website visits to help improve the content of the website and to provide regular reports to our current and future donors and funding organizations. The type of digital cookie information collected during your visit and any derived data cannot be used or combined with other information to personally identify you. Fair Observer does not use personal data collected from its website for advertising purposes or to market to you.As a convenience to you, Fair Observer provides buttons that link to popular social media sites, called social sharing buttons, to help you share Fair Observer content and your comments and opinions about it on these social media sites. These social sharing buttons are provided by and are part of these social media sites. They may collect and use personal data as described in their respective policies. Fair Observer does not receive personal data from your use of these social sharing buttons. It is not necessary that you use these buttons to read Fair Observer content or to share on social media.&nbsp;NecessaryNecessaryThese cookies essential for the website to function.Social MediaThese cookies are used to enable sharing or following of content that you find interesting on our website. These settings apply to third-party social networking and other websites.Performance &amp; FunctionalityThese cookies are used to enhance the performance and functionality of our website. They provide statistics on how our website is used and help us improve by measuring errors. Certain functionalities on our website may become unavailable without these cookies.AnalyticsSAVE &amp; ACCEPT

Back to NewslettersSarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, capital city of Bosnia-Herzegovina pinned on political map.© Below the Sky/ shutterstock.comToday, the war in Ukraine, the attempted coup in Russia and the unrest in France are making the headlines. Still, there is another crisis in Europe happening in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Known for its chronic political instability and dysfunctional institutions, the country is showing more signs of disintegration, encouraged by the West.Similarly to the situation that emerged when former High Representative Valentin Inzko imposed amendments to the...

Fair Observer - World News, International Politics, Global Economy & Business News

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS