Interesting article brought forward, unnecessarily cruel also, from my point of view, something like carnage is not to be relieved in a public setting like this, it serves no purpose other than entertainment for the ones not related and curious.

Very little information on why jurors were shown the video and what precedent this might create for jurors or whether this is usual for jurors to have to watch difficult footage often. A lot of emotional detail added to paint a picture of the day. The fact that the jury watched it is true, the facts of the case seem true as told, but the emotional sensationalism is clear in the article too.