Full of inconsistencies the author hopes the reader won't notice. The government mentioned that the cost of the investment in bitcoin was a certain percentage of their national budget and an author of a bitcoin book says it's way more than that percentage. Now we're caught in a he said, she said. Article keeps trying to say this will effect the Salvadorean citizens while repeating that the citizens never really bought into the crypto game anyway from the start. The only conclusions given are opinionated adjectives and concerned citizens feeling the global inflation of products.

I actually believe that El Salvador made a good decision, the funds that went for the project to invest in bitcoin wasn't detrimental to their country's economy and if it had paid out many other would have followed, I just feel that they were a little too late to the party and did it for the news attraction instead of the actual payout.

There is a lot of sensational language added by the author that is both unnecessary and contradicts the figures provided as evidence of the scale of El Salvador's very minimal Bitcoin investments.