Name: We’ll keep pummeling people with facts that leave out context
Brand: niemanlab.org
SKU: niemanlab-org-31
Availability: OnlineOnly
Rating: 75 (1 reviews)

critic

We’ll keep pummeling people with facts that leave out context

preview

—In 2022, I want to believe that the national media will finally take its role as a pillar of democracy seriously. But frankly, I doubt it. Coverage will continue to perpetuate the erosion of social norms, of human rights, and of democracy. Political media will continue to use false equivalency, problematic images, and the perpetual belief that objectivity is white, male, and affluent. Climate change will continue to get short shrift because it’s too technical, it’s too scary, it’s not sexy.Articles pontificating on who’ll win the midterm elections will bury the largest threat to human life on this planet. That coverage will ignore the meat of policies —&nbsp;whether policies will hurt or improve the lives of people in this country —&nbsp;in favor of the horse race. It will continue to perpetuate the notion that what matters is who wins, not the impact that policies will actually have on people.There will be allegedly neutral articles that drip with derision at the idea that the government has a responsibility to the wellbeing of its citizens. This concept will remain beneath those who see the role of journalism as being above it all. The public will continue to be told to care about Biden’s Peloton and that in slanted stories that paint real security risks as phobias. Meanwhile, stories on policies that actually affect people’s lives will be told in sweeping terms that are difficult to parse. As a result, citizens will feel a certain way about elected officials unrelated to those officials’ actions.I know that things will continue this way because I’ve spent the past year and a half —&nbsp;as has almost every reporter I know who covers climate —&nbsp;looking, with rising despair, at the way many national media organizations handled Covid-19 reporting.Here was a massive problem —&nbsp;a global problem —&nbsp;with visible cause and effect. But at every turn, much of the national media chose to sensationalize when they should have been a mollifying voice, to muddy the waters instead of clarifying. They chose to center calls to “open up” —&nbsp;some the result of coordinated astroturf campaigns —&nbsp;even as the vast majority of people in the United States wanted things to remain closed. If we can’t give clear, accurate messages about something as transparent as an infectious disease, what hope do we have for the complexity of climate change?This is where I’m supposed to note that there are people out there doing good work —&nbsp;and there are. But not enough to be a bulwark against a system that continues to treat democracy as a spectator sport.News reports rarely tell us when public comment periods on bills are open, so the public can weigh in. They tell us about school board takeovers, often funded by special interests. But how often is the public —&nbsp;that is, those without entrenched financial interests —&nbsp;told how they can run for school board?And our industry doesn’t just avoid telling the public about their government and how they can affect it. We often see the act of telling our audiences these things as somehow not objective. We rarely explain the structures of our democracy in ways that let people see how to interact with it, which leaves it instead in the hands of special interests who can bankroll their perspectives, even when they’re actively harmful. Millions of people in this country live downwind of polluting plants, or live in communities that foster ill health because they have been systemically denied full participation in this country’s democratic structures and processes, and the news media has played a role in that. It’s no wonder that democracy in the United States .All of this is happening against the ticking clock of climate change. Each day’s delay means more severe weather —&nbsp;worsening hurricanes, floods, wildfires, heat waves, crop loss. It’s not just that the U.S. is falling; it’s that we threaten to bring the world down with us. Little of the gravity of what we’re facing makes it into everyday news coverage in a way that would allow us to have real conversations as a country on how to chart a way forward. Instead, each day, we as an industry —&nbsp;to borrow from John Nichols and Robert McChesney’s book —&nbsp;pummel people with facts, but not the context to make sense of them.In short, I expect 2022 to be much like 2021…only worse.is senior climate reporter with the Gimlet podcast .In 2022, I want to believe that the national media will finally take its role as a pillar of democracy seriously. But frankly, I doubt it. Coverage will continue to perpetuate the erosion of social norms, of human rights, and of democracy. Political media will continue to use false equivalency, problematic images, and the perpetual belief that objectivity is white, male, and affluent. Climate change will continue to get short shrift because it’s too technical, it’s too scary, it’s not sexy.Articles pontificating on who’ll win the midterm elections will bury the largest threat to human life on this planet. That coverage will ignore the meat of policies —&nbsp;whether policies will hurt or improve the lives of people in this country —&nbsp;in favor of the horse race. It will continue to perpetuate the notion that what matters is who wins, not the impact that policies will actually have on people.There will be allegedly neutral articles that drip with derision at the idea that the government has a responsibility to the wellbeing of its citizens. This concept will remain beneath those who see the role of journalism as being above it all. The public will continue to be told to care about Biden’s Peloton and that in slanted stories that paint real security risks as phobias. Meanwhile, stories on policies that actually affect people’s lives will be told in sweeping terms that are difficult to parse. As a result, citizens will feel a certain way about elected officials unrelated to those officials’ actions.I know that things will continue this way because I’ve spent the past year and a half —&nbsp;as has almost every reporter I know who covers climate —&nbsp;looking, with rising despair, at the way many national media organizations handled Covid-19 reporting.Here was a massive problem —&nbsp;a global problem —&nbsp;with visible cause and effect. But at every turn, much of the national media chose to sensationalize when they should have been a mollifying voice, to muddy the waters instead of clarifying. They chose to center calls to “open up” —&nbsp;some the result of coordinated astroturf campaigns —&nbsp;even as the vast majority of people in the United States wanted things to remain closed. If we can’t give clear, accurate messages about something as transparent as an infectious disease, what hope do we have for the complexity of climate change?This is where I’m supposed to note that there are people out there doing good work —&nbsp;and there are. But not enough to be a bulwark against a system that continues to treat democracy as a spectator sport.News reports rarely tell us when public comment periods on bills are open, so the public can weigh in. They tell us about school board takeovers, often funded by special interests. But how often is the public —&nbsp;that is, those without entrenched financial interests —&nbsp;told how they can run for school board?And our industry doesn’t just avoid telling the public about their government and how they can affect it. We often see the act of telling our audiences these things as somehow not objective. We rarely explain the structures of our democracy in ways that let people see how to interact with it, which leaves it instead in the hands of special interests who can bankroll their perspectives, even when they’re actively harmful. Millions of people in this country live downwind of polluting plants, or live in communities that foster ill health because they have been systemically denied full participation in this country’s democratic structures and processes, and the news media has played a role in that. It’s no wonder that democracy in the United States .All of this is happening against the ticking clock of climate change. Each day’s delay means more severe weather —&nbsp;worsening hurricanes, floods, wildfires, heat waves, crop loss. It’s not just that the U.S. is falling; it’s that we threaten to bring the world down with us. Little of the gravity of what we’re facing makes it into everyday news coverage in a way that would allow us to have real conversations as a country on how to chart a way forward. Instead, each day, we as an industry —&nbsp;to borrow from John Nichols and Robert McChesney’s book —&nbsp;pummel people with facts, but not the context to make sense of them.In short, I expect 2022 to be much like 2021…only worse.is senior climate reporter with the Gimlet podcast .What to read nextThese stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.Fuego is our heat-seeking Twitter bot, tracking the links the future-of-journalism crowd is talking about most on Twitter.Here are a few of the top links Fuego’s currently watching. &nbsp;&nbsp;Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo. &nbsp;&nbsp;Help advance the Nieman Foundation’s mission “to promote and elevate the standards of journalism” .© 2022 by the President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeWalter Lippmann HouseOne Francis Ave.Cambridge, MA 02138617 495 2237The Nieman Journalism Lab is a collaborative attempt to figure out how quality journalism can survive and thrive in the Internet age.It’s a project of the .Follow usThe basicsProjectsDirectorStaff writers© President and Fellows of Harvard College, unless otherwise noted.

—In 2022, I want to believe that the national media will finally take its role as a pillar of democracy seriously. But frankly, I doubt it. Coverage will continue to perpetuate the erosion of social norms, of human rights, and of democracy. Political media will continue to use false equivalency, problematic images, and the perpetual belief that objectivity is white, male, and affluent. Climate change will continue to get short shrift because it’s too technical, it’s too scary, it’s not sexy.Articles pontificating on who’ll win the midterm elections will bury the largest threat to human life...

public

Now @Gimletmedia @WGAEast @slevittslevitt past @popsci @MIT_sciwrite Anti mayo. Pro The Expanse. Saying the quiet part out loud. All my tweets are subtweets.

Kendra Pierre-Louis

We are the Nieman Journalism Lab, part of @niemanfdn at Harvard. We're trying to figure out the future of news.

We’ll keep pummeling people with facts that leave out context

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS