Name: D.C.-to-Baltimore maglev would only benefit rich, Amtrak chief says
Brand: washingtonpost.com
SKU: washingtonpost-com-1433
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

D.C.-to-Baltimore maglev would only benefit rich, Amtrak chief says

preview

This article was published more than&nbsp;1 year agoCommentGift ShareAmtrak CEO William J. Flynn on Thursday took a shot at the proposed maglev train line for the Northeast Corridor, telling Congress the technology is vastly more expensive and environmentally disruptive than conventional and high-speed rail — and once built, it would serve only the rich.“The huge public expenditures required to construct a maglev line would benefit only a small number of affluent travelers,” Flynn said during to the House subcommittee on railroads, pipelines and hazardous materials.“Constructing a maglev line is much more expensive than building a new high-speed rail line, and vastly more costly than upgrading an existing rail line for higher speeds,” Flynn said while making the case for investments in Amtrak. “Construction of a maglev line through heavily populated areas would also be much more environmentally disruptive. … Maglevs are also not as energy efficient as Amtrak trains.”AdvertisementFlynn’s comments at a congressional hearing on the benefits and challenges of high-speed rail preceded , chief executive of Baltimore-Washington Rapid Rail, which is proposing the maglev line.Rogers told the panel a maglev system would be complementary to Amtrak service, criticizing the existing service by saying the Northeast Corridor “lacks modern first-class transportation infrastructure.”The maglev project is undergoing a , facing opposition from federal agencies, local leaders and some residents who argue that investments should instead be made on Amtrak and commuter trains.The 40-mile “superconducting magnetic levitation train system” is planned as the first leg of a system that would carry passengers between Washington and New York in an hour. The D.C.-to-Baltimore trip would take 15 minutes at speeds up to 311 mph. Plans call for its construction within a decade.AdvertisementThe maglev trip time would be 15 minutes faster than an Acela train, which takes about 30 minutes. Flynn said that Acela trip could be cut to 21 minutes if federal investments are made, with the planned replacement of a Civil War-era tunnel south of Baltimore and other track improvements. Enhancements in the Northeast also would allow for D.C.-to-New York trips in two hours, he said.The cost to ride the maglev would be higher than using Amtrak. According to a federal analysis, the expected average fare would be $60 for a one-way trip to Baltimore, although it could vary between $27 and $80 per trip. Amtrak’s Acela costs about $46 one way, and a coach seat on a regular train can cost as little as $8.Flynn’s comments come as the railroad is on a crusade to build support — both financial and political — for a major expansion of its network. Amtrak has unveiled a plan to provide new intercity service to 160 communities and expand service in corridors with heightened demand for rail. The passenger railroad is pushing for .Amtrak: Interstate 66: Seaplanes: Metro: Silver Line: CommentsGift ArticleTOP STORIESThe Travel EnthusiastTravel news, guides and tips for anyone looking to get away.Try a different topic or to save your preferences

This article was published more than&nbsp;1 year agoCommentGift ShareAmtrak CEO William J. Flynn on Thursday took a shot at the proposed maglev train line for the Northeast Corridor, telling Congress the technology is vastly more expensive and environmentally disruptive than conventional and high-speed rail — and once built, it would serve only the rich.“The huge public expenditures required to construct a maglev line would benefit only a small number of affluent travelers,” Flynn said during to the House subcommittee on railroads, pipelines and hazardous materials.“Constructing a maglev...

public

Luz Lazo

washingtonpost.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

D.C.-to-Baltimore maglev would only benefit rich, Amtrak chief says

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS