Many specific details that appear consistent with the obvious facts. The article mentions which laws were being investigated and several other details that may not be exactly right, but I could not imagine the NYT would attempt to distort. There are a couple of contentions that I could *NOT* determine credibility for. E.g., “Mr. Giuliani became fixated” on removing Ambassador Yovanovitch, and that Giuliani's “image has been sullied by his effort to help Mr. Trump dig up dirt.” These are subjective. I don't doubt them, and they are NOT the focus of the story, however. An important and insightful story.

Although this article provides a lot of useful context, especially around the nuance of search warrants involving lawyers. My issue with this article is that it repeatedly frames the F.B.I.'s investigation as a reaction to Rudy Giuliani's attempt to "dig up dirt in Ukraine on President Biden’s son", rather than an investigation to reveal whether or not such activity truly happened.