Name: New Data on Law Enforcement Use of Clearview Added to Map Tracking Use of Facial Recognition Across the U.S.
Brand: fightforthefuture.org
SKU: fightforthefuture-org-5
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

New Data on Law Enforcement Use of Clearview Added to Map Tracking Use of Facial Recognition Across the U.S.

preview

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 8, 2021Contact: Caitlin Seeley George, , 303-594-4321With more data on where facial recognition is used, the urgency for legislation banning government and law enforcement use of facial recognition heightens.Earlier this week, BuzzFeed News the story that employees at law enforcement agencies across the country have run thousands of facial recognition searches using the controversial Clearview AI app. The investigative research included data from a confidential source that shows nearly 2,000 agencies that have used the application in some fashion.This data has now been added to the Ban Facial Recognition Map:This interactive map, created by digital rights group Fight for the Future, shows where facial recognition surveillance is happening, how it’s spreading, and where there are efforts to rein it in. It is also a resource for people to take action and send messages to their lawmakers, calling on them to ban law enforcement and government use of the technology.With the addition of this data on Clearview use, all 50 states, except Vermont—the only state that has banned law enforcement use of facial recognition, plus DC and the Virgin Islands, are represented on the map.The states with the most taxpayer-funded entities that have used Clearview are:*States with local bans on law enforcement use of facial recognition“Although it’s terrifying to add nearly 2,000 more places to our map where we know facial recognition is threatening communities, this data highlights what we already know: that law enforcement is using facial recognition in ways that fundamentally threaten any semblance of human rights, due process, and exacerbate existing discrimination. The only way to stop this is to ban it,” said Caitlin Seeley George, director of campaigns and operations at Fight for the Future. “Since officers often use Clearview without their department’s knowledge or consent, this is the first time we’ve seen how widespread this use is. It’s clear that no amount of regulations can protect us when officers are already using Clearview in secret. The only solution is a ban.”The good news is that cities, counties, and states are taking action to combat law enforcement use of facial recognition and are banning the technology. In the past few months Minneapolis, MN, Madison, WI, and New Orleans, LA have banned facial recognition. Last year Senators Markey and Merkley and Representatives Jayapal and Pressley federal legislation to ban law enforcement and government use of facial recognition, and they are expected to reintroduce the legislation again this year.Share on:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 8, 2021Contact: Caitlin Seeley George, , 303-594-4321With more data on where facial recognition is used, the urgency for legislation banning government and law enforcement use of facial recognition heightens.Earlier this week, BuzzFeed News the story that employees at law enforcement agencies across the country have run thousands of facial recognition searches using the controversial Clearview AI app. The investigative research included data from a confidential source that shows nearly 2,000 agencies that have used the application in some fashion.This data has...

public

Fight for the Future

fightforthefuture.org

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

New Data on Law Enforcement Use of Clearview Added to Map Tracking Use of Facial Recognition Across the U.S.

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS