Name: St. Louis lawsuit over Rams move to LA won’t go to trial until next year
Brand: fox2now.com
SKU: fox2now-com-118
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

St. Louis lawsuit over Rams move to LA won’t go to trial until next year

preview

Posted: Mar 10, 2021 / 04:41 PM CSTUpdated: Mar 11, 2021 / 06:29 AM CSTThis is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.ST. LOUIS, Mo. – The lawsuit seeking damages for St. Louis interests over ‘s move of the back to Los Angeles, which was scheduled to go to trial in October, now will not be heard until at least January, due to coronavirus concerns.In a teleconference with St. Louis circuit judge Christopher McGraugh, Jim Bennett, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said they were prepared to attempt to try the case in October as scheduled, while attorney Robert Haar argued a start on January 10 was “much more realistic.”McGraugh told counsel there had been discussion in the courthouse that jury trials could be delayed until June or July.The bulk of Wednesday’s hearing, addressed the process of jury selection, and how questionnaires could be used to help identify potential jurors before they are examined in court. One of the questions in the questionnaire would likely involve the question of hardship–would a juror be available for the length of a trial. Bennett said plaintiffs would need four weeks, while Haar said the defendants needed more time to consider it., who have had several attempts to move the case out of St. Louis rejected, several times Wednesday described the expected challenges of seating an impartial jury here, with attorney Gerard Carmody citing “the bias issue.”The sides agreed to have draft questions for a questionnaire ready for McGraugh’s review, by late July.“I hope someday we can all be in the same courtroom together,” Judge McGraugh said as the teleconference ended.Suggest a CorrectionThanks for signing up!Watch for us in your inbox.Subscribe Now✕× Close Ad

Posted: Mar 10, 2021 / 04:41 PM CSTUpdated: Mar 11, 2021 / 06:29 AM CSTThis is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.ST. LOUIS, Mo. – The lawsuit seeking damages for St. Louis interests over ‘s move of the back to Los Angeles, which was scheduled to go to trial in October, now will not be heard until at least January, due to coronavirus concerns.In a teleconference with St. Louis circuit judge Christopher McGraugh, Jim Bennett, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said they were prepared...

public

Gregg Palermo

fox2now.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

St. Louis lawsuit over Rams move to LA won’t go to trial until next year

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS