Name: After judges rewrite GOP lawmakers' ballot language, Missouri House votes to strip their power
Brand: stltoday.com
SKU: stltoday-com-223
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

After judges rewrite GOP lawmakers' ballot language, Missouri House votes to strip their power

preview

Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.Last chance! Subscribe with this special offer to keep readingLoading&amp;hellp;{{title}}{{description}}{{banner}}(renews at {{format_dollars}}{{start_price}}{{format_cents}}/month + tax){{tagline}}{{special_title}}{{html}}You are the owner of this article.You have permission to edit this article.© 2022 Lee EnterprisesShare ThisAfter judges rewrite GOP lawmakers' ballot language, Missouri House votes to strip their powerShare thisJEFFERSON CITY — After Missouri courts last year threw out and rewrote the Legislature’s ballot language for a proposed change to the state constitution, Republican lawmakers moved Wednesday night to strip judges’ power to rewrite ballot language.Legislation sponsored by Rep. John Wiemann, R-O’Fallon, would bar judges from rewriting ballot language for proposed constitutional or statutory changes written by the Legislature.The House gave the measure first-round approval Wednesday night.The effort follows rulings from two courts in the run-up to the November election that tossed the Legislature’s wording for a question that dramatically changed the way Missouri was to draw state legislative districts after the 2020 U.S. Census.In addition to the redistricting changes, which repealed the “nonpartisan state demographer” position voters approved in 2018, the measure banned lobbyist gifts.That portion was seen as more popular than the redistricting changes, and lawmakers led with it.and rewrote the summary. She ruled in August the language was “insufficient and unfair” and violated Missouri law. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District and made additional edits before it appeared on the ballot.After the revisions, the redistricting question, Amendment 3, narrowly passed with 51% support.requires ballot summaries to be “a true and impartial statement of the purposes of the proposed measure” and “neither intentionally argumentative nor likely to create prejudice either for or against the proposed measure.”Wiemann argued lawmakers were preventing judges from “legislating from the bench,” because writing the language is the Legislature’s job. If judges decide the ballot language is unconstitutional, they can reject it but not rewrite it.“I think that we do a pretty good job of passing legislation,” he said. “I think people are smart enough to be able to read the ballot language that we put in there.”But Democrats said the proposal would make it easier for partisan language to make its way onto the ballot.“We’re trying to make democracy accessible for people, and when we allow a supermajority to dictate the language that is on these ballot initiatives, we do a disservice” to constituents, said Rep. Ashley Aune, D-Kansas City.The legislation is .Wednesday’s vote followed a separate effort earlier in the day making it harder for citizens to change the state constitution.Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.{{title}}{{summary}}You don't have any notifications.Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.Topics

Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.Last chance! Subscribe with this special offer to keep readingLoading&amp;hellp;{{title}}{{description}}{{banner}}(renews at {{format_dollars}}{{start_price}}{{format_cents}}/month + tax){{tagline}}{{special_title}}{{html}}You are the owner of this article.You have permission to edit this article.© 2022 Lee EnterprisesShare ThisAfter judges rewrite GOP lawmakers' ballot language, Missouri House votes to strip their powerShare thisJEFFERSON CITY — After Missouri courts last year threw out...

public

Jack Suntrup

Maria Benevento

stltoday.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

After judges rewrite GOP lawmakers' ballot language, Missouri House votes to strip their power

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS