Name: UN Rebuke of US Sanctions on Venezuela Met With Stunning Silence - FAIR
Brand: fair.org
SKU: fair-org-55
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

UN Rebuke of US Sanctions on Venezuela Met With Stunning Silence - FAIR

preview

&nbsp;UN investigator Alena Douhan () “.”Alena Douhan, the UN special rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, her preliminary report on February 12 on the impact of US and European sanctions on Venezuela.The report laid bare how a years-long campaign of economic warfare has asphyxiated Venezuela’s economy, crushing the government’s ability to provide basic services both before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.“The [Venezuelan] government’s revenue was reported to shrink by 99%, with the country currently living on 1% of its pre-sanctions income,” Douhan found, impeding “the ability of Venezuela to respond to the Covid-19 emergency.”Douhan thus urgedthe governments of the United Kingdom, Portugal and the United States and corresponding banks to unfreeze assets of the Venezuela Central Bank to purchase medicine, vaccines, food, medical and other equipment.The campaign to overthrow the Venezuelan government, Douhan added, “violates the principle of sovereign equality of states and constitutes an intervention in domestic affairs of Venezuela that also affects its regional relations.”Douhan’s report follows a Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) that estimated that sanctions were responsible for over 40,000 deaths in Venezuela in 2017–18&nbsp; (FAIR.org, ). Though sanctions were not the only factor driving economic hardship, CEPR found that theyexacerbated Venezuela’s economic crisis and made it nearly impossible to stabilize the economy, contributing further to excess deaths. All of these impacts disproportionately harmed the poorest and most vulnerable Venezuelans.Like the CEPR study, Douhan’s report has been categorically ignored across establishment media.By omitting the devastating impact of sanctions, corporate media attribute sole responsibility for economic and humanitarian conditions to the Venezuelan government, thereby using the misery provoked by sanctions to validate the infliction of even more misery.Darth Vader: seen by the US as a role model.US and European officials have long admitted that the sanctions regime against Venezuela is collective punishment by design. Speaking to G20 foreign ministers in May 2018, then–British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson :The feeling I get from talking to my counterparts is that they see no alternative to economic pressure—and it’s very sad, because obviously the downside of sanctions is that they can affect the population that you don’t want to suffer. But in the end things have got to get worse before they get better—and we may have to tighten the economic screw on Venezuela.On March 22, 2019, a senior US government official :The effect of the sanctions [against Venezuela] is continuing and cumulative. It’s sort of like in Star Wars when Darth Vader constricts somebody’s throat, that’s what we are doing to the regime economically.A year later, as the Covid-19 virus spread globally, US Attorney General William Barr that the pandemic wasgood timing, actually.… The [Trump] administration is taking a kind of “kick them while they’re down” approach, seemingly with the hope that by piling on sanctions and other actions, the administration can capitalize on the virus in Iran and Venezuela to spur greater public opposition to the incumbent governments and perhaps regime change.“Although sanctions do not seem to be physical warfare weapons,” the Lancet () noted, “they are just as deadly, if not more so. Jeopardising the health of populations for political ends is not only illegal but also barbaric.”Many Western journalists, however, appear not to have seen these overt declarations of collective punishment against the Venezuelan population—a under Article 7 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, according to former UN Expert Alfred de Zayas.The Guardian () gets blame for Maduro into the subhead—but doesn’t mention sanctions until the penultimate paragraph.Loath to abandon belief in the fundamentally benign nature of Western foreign policy, corporate scribes have typically presented the devastating effects of sanctions as a mere accusation of Nicolás Maduro. “Maduro…said US sanctions were hurting his administration’s ability to buy medicines and foodstuffs” was the next-to-last paragraph of a Guardian piece () on Covid in Venezuela whose subhead read, “Continuing chaotic situation under Nicolás Maduro leaves hospitals and health services desperately unprepared.”Often, they fail to sanctions at all. In June 2019, for instance, the Guardian’s reported that “more than 4 million Venezuelans have now fled economic and humanitarian chaos,” citing would-be coup leader Juan Guaidó’s claim that the country’s economic collapse “was caused by the corruption of this regime,” without making any reference to Washington’s campaign of economic warfare.Keeping with tradition, Douhan’s damning report has been met with stunning silence by establishment media outlets. Neither the Guardian, New York Times,&nbsp; Washington Post nor BBC reported on Douhan’s findings, leaving the task primarily to alternative media (Venezuelanalysis, ; Canary, ).&nbsp; (CNN——had an exceptional report focused on the UN report, which noted Douhan’s statement that sanctions “constitute violations of international law.”)The issue is not that Western media are uninterested in Venezuela. In February 2019, the month after Juan Guaidó declared himself president, the Guardian published 67 separate articles about Venezuela, regularly the UN on Venezuela’s economic and humanitarian conditions—signaling Maduro’s sole responsibility for a crisis about which something must surely be done.For example, the Guardian () reported in 2019, “The UN’s political and peace building chief, Rosemary DiCarlo, depicted a devastating collapse in Venezuela’s health system”—while making no reference to sanctions.Similarly, the New York Times, whose editorial board had 10 out of 12 US-backed coups in Latin America since 1954, has regularly the deteriorating economic situation in Venezuela with—at best—only fleeting to US and European sanctions.The New York Times (), for instance, described how “Yajaira Paz, 35, has lost nearly everything” to the Venezuelan economic crisis: “her mother, dead from a heart problem she could not afford to treat; her brothers, to migration; her faith in democracy, to the nation’s crippled institutions” — omitting any mention of sanctions.The Washington Post Magazine () reports that “most Venezuelans eat fewer than two meals a day”—but doesn’t mention that it’s US government policy to make their lives worse.The Washington Post Magazine () ran a similarly emotive article, noting how “the pandemic wore away even more access to basic necessities in a country racked by deepening poverty and crisis,” blaming “the national mismanagement of resources” and, again, ignoring the existence of sanctions.Corporate media thus consistently emphasizes the gravity of Venezuela’s humanitarian situation while overlooking crucial evidence on the catastrophic impact of sanctions, fortifying the very narratives deployed to justify the economic siege against Venezuela.The collective silence over Douhan’s report is only the most recent case of propaganda by omission on Venezuela. By refusing to acknowledge Washington and London’s fundamental role in making Venezuela’s “economy ,” corporate media play a key part in manufacturing consent for regime change.FAIR’s work is sustained by our generous contributors, who allow us to remain independent. today to be a part of this important mission.You can also support FAIR on Patreon! Click the button below!Our political establishment and its media mouthpieces have lots to say about human rights violations by various other countries and how much they oppose them, but they ignore or distort what’s going on in Venezuela and other countries whose populations are being hurt by U.S. embargoes, sanctions, weapons sales and military assaults. Thank you, Ms. Douhan and UN!I’d go with “Loath to abandon [fomenting] belief in the fundamentally benign nature of Western foreign policy … “Same thing with Iran. All of this, combined, should demonstrate to anyone with a modicum of common sense that our corporate media, including establishment right-leaning media, all march in lockstep when it comes to excusing or justifying the actions of the Evil Empire and propagandizing all Americans that to criticize these actions makes one a “commie” or Anti-American.How’s that for a doozy?The UK has Venezuela’s money and gold and won’t give it back to that nation.. The US tries to overthrow a fairly elected President. Even Jimmy Carter said it was a fair election and Maduro won. The US tries to get a stupid man named Juan Guiado in as president. If the people wanted him —Guiado would have been elected. Work on living up to the words of the PREAMBLE America, because so much of those wonderful ideas are still left unfulfilled.Excellent article!It’s murder. It doesn’t matter how bad Maduro’s regime is or isn’t, it doesn’t justify the means: the means is not only violent like a siege war, it is arrogant and presumptuous as mad in how it is supposedly justified.Any country or leader in a country that offends America’s way of doing business is in for IT!Blum’s, book Killing Hope; Voss, The United States of War, Economic Hit Man and many others point to American attacks on weaker nations and their leaders.US leadership is always certain that “Our way is the only right way.”FAIR’s 4-page, ad-free, newsletter publishes ten times a year bringing you the media analysis and activism that you won’t find anywhere else. Choose a print subscription, a digital PDF edition, or both together.FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. We expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled. As a progressive group, we believe that structural reform is ultimately needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting and promote strong non-profit sources of information.Fairness &amp; Accuracy In Reporting124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201New York, NY 10001Tel: 212-633-6700We rely on your support to keep running. Please consider donating.This work is licensed under a License.

&nbsp;UN investigator Alena Douhan () “.”Alena Douhan, the UN special rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, her preliminary report on February 12 on the impact of US and European sanctions on Venezuela.The report laid bare how a years-long campaign of economic warfare has asphyxiated Venezuela’s economy, crushing the government’s ability to provide basic services both before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.“The [Venezuelan] government’s revenue was reported to shrink by 99%, with the country currently living on 1% of its...

public

John McEvoy

Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, holding corporate media accountable for distortions & omissions since 1986. http://mastodon.world/@FAIR

UN Rebuke of US Sanctions on Venezuela Met With Stunning Silence - FAIR

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS