Amazon found selling unlicensed cell signal boosters | Engadget
U.S. · TECH
September 2, 20192 min read318 words
Published: September 2, 2019  |  2 min read318 words
Amazon has been found selling more than . Wired has that the internet retailer has been selling without FCC licenses (such as those from MingColl, Phonelex and Subroad), including some marked as Amazon's Choice. The devices are not only unlikely to pass the registration process w...
Amazon found selling unlicensed cell signal boosters | Engadget Read more

Scores for this article.

Percentage of critic and public trust in this article.
Balanced2
img-trusted
N/A
critic score
critic reviews: 1
img-trusted
75%
public score
public reviews: 4
img-trusted
75%
critic score
4 reviews
img-contested
59%
public score
17 reviews
img-contested
N/A
critic score
2 reviews
img-trusted
60%
public score
5 reviews

CRITIC REVIEWS

Investigative
September 2, 2019
Interesting, from a credible source. Points up the difficulty, as an online marketplace, in policing, so to speak, what is and isn't legal to sell. Brief and informative, particularly for those in the online selling business.
September 2, 2019
Is this helpful?

PUBLIC REVIEWS

Balanced
September 20, 2019
I would have liked to know more about how these devices cause issues, but other than that one shortcoming, this is an informative and factual article about products that could be found on Amazon. The tone is neutral and does not use any obviously slanted language to describe the products or Amazon.
September 20, 2019
Is this helpful?
Surface Level
September 5, 2019
This article leaves a lot to be desired. I'm sure everything it says is true, but it lacks detail that is needed to fully understand how big of a deal this is and what actions will take place because of these events.
September 5, 2019
Is this helpful?
Balanced
September 4, 2019
I went into this piece expecting the usual anti-big tech hit piece, making something out of nothing. Although it appears Amazon is not legally at fault for the activities in question, it is worthy of coverage and Amazon should be re-reviewing their policy internally towards such devices, as well as their Amazon Choice recommendation system. Author Jon Fingas did well not to overstep and use this story as an excuse to attack Amazon, but instead framed it as a heads up to Amazon that they could be doing better in this area.
September 4, 2019
Is this helpful?
Investigative
September 2, 2019
More then selling unlicensed cell tower signal boosters which have knocked out signals for entire neighborhoods, the article includes other listings on Amazon for dangerous items which have been fatal to some buyers. The article cites a WSJ investigation which " found at least 2,000 listings on Amazon for toys and medications that lacked warnings about health risks to children. Reporters also unearthed toxic paint strippers, infant sleeping mats linked to suffocation, dietary supplements containing illegal prescription drugs, toys containing lead and products that falsely stated they were cleared by a federal agency". This article once again informs us of capitalism's complete disregard for anything other then profits and of the potentially fatal consequences of de regulation. The warning "Buyer Beware" has never been more true.
September 2, 2019
Is this helpful?