This article is hypocritical for calling out media poor choices in covering Trump in 2016 election and how, recently, CNN/corporate media has sparked arguments between presidential candidates. Yet, this article is allowing a precedent to continue by covering this exact topic. What does the reader get to benefit in knowing a politically motivated individual thinks about how the media covers the opposite party? It creates a biased story from every angle.

Even as the reporters of this story talk about how media and the debates have become wrestling matches, the quotes going back and forth here feel like exactly that. We live in a media environment of sensationalism and confrontation, and this article is presented in the same light, which is why it missed out on a fourth and fifth star.