Name: San Jose passes mandatory $3-an-hour pay raise for grocery workers
Brand: mercurynews.com
SKU: mercurynews-com-294
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

San Jose passes mandatory $3-an-hour pay raise for grocery workers

preview

By | Bay Area News GroupThousands of San Jose grocery store workers will soon receive a $3-an-hour boost on their paychecks, as San Jose became the latest city to pass a new ordinance compelling large grocers to offer their employees&nbsp; hazard pay for their high risk of catching COVID-19 at work.The San Jose City Council voted 7-3 Tuesday night for&nbsp;a new ordinance&nbsp;temporarily requiring corporate grocery stores, chain supermarkets and retail stores that sell groceries and employ at least 300 people nationwide to pay workers an additional $3 an hour on top of their regular wages. The ordinance will last for 120 days after it goes into effect. Small businesses and franchises with less than 300 employees are exempt.The ordinance that it must be backed by at least eight members of the council to become effective immediately. Instead, the majority vote means that the new ordinance&nbsp;will be enacted in about two months.Councilman Sergio Jimenez, who crafted the ordinance, said he had hoped that it would have garnered more support but was nonetheless pleased that the city will provide relief to front line grocery workers.“I feel strongly that this is the right thing to do in my gut,” Jimenez said. “And I’m hoping that in 120 days, the sky didn’t fall, stores didn’t close, the economy is looking up and these companies continue to do well.”San Jose will soon join , Long Beach, Santa Monica and Seattle, which have all passed similar ordinances in recent weeks to mandate increased wages for grocery store workers. Santa Clara County will vote later this month on&nbsp;a $5-an-hour boost on the paychecks of workers in grocery stores and fast-food restaurants everywhere in the county, except for San Jose.San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo and council members Dev Davis and Matt Mahan voted against the ‘hazard pay’ legislation Tuesday night, citing an inadequate analysis of the possible financial effects, concerns over potential store closings and increased grocery prices and a disagreement over exactly which companies should be affected by the legislation. Councilmember Pam Foley recused herself from the vote because she holds stock in Amazon, the owner of Whole Foods, which would be affected by the ordinance.Since the ordinance was first proposed about two weeks ago, it has been amended in several ways, including dropping the required additional pay from $5 an hour to $3 an hour and placing an expiration date on the ordinance 120 days after it goes into effect, rather than the termination of Santa Clara County’s COVID-19 emergency declaration. Jimenez said he made these concessions after speaking with grocery store executives and hearing their concerns.Despite the modifications, Jim Araby, a spokesperson for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 5, commended the city for passing the ordinance and showing that “San Jose values the contributions of grocery workers.”“The San Jose City Council passed a much-needed hazard pay ordinance for thousands of local grocery workers in San Jose,” Araby said in a statement. “Some of the pandemic profits will be put back in the pockets of grocery workers who face the risks of exposure to ensure that our communities have access to food.”Prior to Tuesday night’s meeting, Councilmember Mahan unveiled a different proposal that he considered a compromise and believed could clear the eight-vote requirement to allow a ‘hazard pay’ ordinance to go into effect immediately across San Jose. Liccardo and Davis were both prepared to support his version of the hazard pay ordinance.His proposal included three glaring differences from Jimenez’s plan: the legislation would only apply to publicly-traded companies, it could be paid out as bonus pay or an increase in base salary and it would last for 120 days or “until the date that Santa Clara County reports that it has sufficient vaccine doses and appointments to have scheduled vaccinations for every willing food retail worker.”While concerns were brought up about each proposed adjustment, the main sticking point among city leaders was the discrepancy over which companies would be subject to the new legislation.Mahan said his goal of only applying the legislation to publicly-traded companies was to “reduce the risk that employees of smaller chains — such as Chavez, Cardenas, Lion, Mi Pueblo, Mitsuwa, Nijiya and 99 Ranch — do not lose jobs or hours as a result of the city policy” and protect grocery stores from closing in “struggling neighborhoods that tend not to attract the national brand, publicly-owned chains.”“Our policy decisions have real-world consequences and we should be honest there are benefits to this policy but there also may be costs,” Mahan said during the meeting. ” My intention here is to maximize the benefits while minimizing the broader cost.”Liccardo agreed with Mahan, saying that if the city applied the ordinance to smaller chains like Cardenas then the city might be “putting people in the position where you’ve got to lay people off or close a store.”“Those are obviously outcomes that we don’t want in a world where unemployment in many of our neighborhoods is double digits,” he said.But the majority of the city council disagreed with the idea that the smaller grocery store chains listed by Mahan could not handle the additional costs for 120 days, with Jimenez calling the threats of store closures and increased grocery prices a “scare tactic.”Many grocery stores bumped up workers’ pay early into the pandemic but then stopped when some of the public health orders were lifted. Lucky’s was one of the only Bay Area grocery stores to provide employees with additional hazard pay throughout the course of the pandemic, including now.John Gomez, a grocery store employee, urged the council not to dwell on the worst-case scenarios but to think about “what you’re going to do to protect the workers in the community from these companies if they decide that’s how they want to do it.”“There are ample profits,” Gomez said. “Lucky’s is the perfect example of why this can be done without raising prices, cutting hours or closing grocery stores.”We invite you to use our commenting platform to engage in insightful conversations about issues in our community. We reserve the right at all times to remove any information or materials that are unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, indecent or otherwise objectionable to us, and to disclose any information necessary to satisfy the law, regulation, or government request. We might permanently block any user who abuses these conditions.Get Morning Report and other email newslettersFollow UsMost PopularClose

By | Bay Area News GroupThousands of San Jose grocery store workers will soon receive a $3-an-hour boost on their paychecks, as San Jose became the latest city to pass a new ordinance compelling large grocers to offer their employees&nbsp; hazard pay for their high risk of catching COVID-19 at work.The San Jose City Council voted 7-3 Tuesday night for&nbsp;a new ordinance&nbsp;temporarily requiring corporate grocery stores, chain supermarkets and retail stores that sell groceries and employ at least 300 people nationwide to pay workers an additional $3 an hour on top of their regular wages....

public

Maggie Angst

Latest Silicon Valley and San Francisco Bay Area news from reporters & columnists at The Mercury News.

San Jose passes mandatory $3-an-hour pay raise for grocery workers

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS