Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
August 4, 201955 words
Published: August 4, 2019  |  55 words
To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.Please make sure your browser supports JavaScript and cookies and that you are not blocking them from loading. For more information you can review our and .For inquiries related to this message please and p...
Bloomberg - Are you a robot? Read more

Scores for this article.

Percentage of critic and public trust in this article.
Well Sourced2
img-contested
N/A
critic score
critic reviews: 0
img-trusted
100%
public score
public reviews: 3
img-trusted
94%
critic score
35 reviews
img-trusted
62%
public score
107 reviews
img-contested
N/A
critic score
0 reviews
img-trusted
100%
public score
3 reviews
img-contested
N/A
critic score
0 reviews
img-trusted
100%
public score
3 reviews

CRITIC REVIEWS

There don't seem to be any reviews yet.

PUBLIC REVIEWS

Well Sourced
August 5, 2019
Although this leans towards blaming Trump, the article is fundamentally about what politicians are saying about the event. The article does so with extensive quotes. It is clearly credible for what it is.
August 5, 2019
Is this helpful?
Well Sourced
August 6, 2019
This article gets dangerously close to outright to blaming the recent attacks on Trump's rhetoric, but I think it just barely makes up for it by sourcing enough of Trump's own words to allow him to defend himself in the piece. I'm sure there are more credible articles on the topic than this one.
August 6, 2019
Is this helpful?
Correlation w/o Causation
August 4, 2019
This article is a bit one-sided until the very end of the article. It also tried to draw a conclusion that Trump's rhetoric inspired this shooting, which can be seen as a political agenda. I believe its correlation without causation because it's impossible to know whether the shooter had previous hate for Mexicans or if it was aggravated by recent Trump tweets. Perhaps both, but Bloomberg is making a strong case for one side.
August 4, 2019
Is this helpful?