Name: India, China begin fresh disengagement, but ‘trust deficit means it’ll be a long process’
Brand: theprint.in
SKU: theprint-in-91
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

India, China begin fresh disengagement, but ‘trust deficit means it’ll be a long process’

preview

Sign inWelcome! Log into your accountPassword recoveryRecover your passwordA password will be e-mailed to you.Text Size:A-A+New Delhi: Nearly nine months after India and China got embroiled in their worst border tensions since the , both sides began a phased disengagement from the southern and northern banks of the Pangong Tso in Ladakh Wednesday.The news first emerged when Senior Colonel Wu Qian, spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of National Defence, issued a written statement, saying: “The Chinese and Indian frontline troops at the southern and northern bank of the Pangong Tso Lake start synchronised and organised disengagement from 10 February…&nbsp;This move is in accordance with the consensus reached by both sides at the 9th round of China-India corps commander-level meeting.”While India has not yet reacted officially to this, sources in the defence and security establishment said that disengagement steps have been initiated. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is set to give a Thursday.ThePrint has learnt that&nbsp;both countries have started to withdraw their armoured elements from the southern banks of the Pangong Tso, while on the northern banks, both sides are carrying out thinning of troops.However, sources in India’s strategic establishment told ThePrint that while China has signalled some “positive movement”, it would have to translate those signals into actions. They said since it is not the Chinese defence ministry that will take the final call, the Chinese Communist Party will have to “prove it in action”.Also read:Sources said these are initial steps that are being taken, and underlined that no soldier is being pulled back from the heights on the southern banks as of now.“This is going to be a long process. There is a trust deficit, and hence, there needs to be a proper verification process before the next round of disengagement takes place,” a source said.Asked if this can be seen as major progress, the source said the correct words would be “cautious optimism”, as this is the third time disengagement is being attempted.The Galwan Valley clash that killed 20 Indian soldiers on 15 June last year had taken place during a verification process after both sides had agreed to disengage from the location.There was another round of disengagement after the clash, when the Chinese pulled out from the Galwan Valley completely. However, disengagement at the Gogra area&nbsp;was not implemented fully by the Chinese.India and China had moved in close to 50,000 troops each in Ladakh after the PLA intruded at multiple locations last May, but both sides&nbsp;&nbsp;as the winters set in. However, this withdrawal took place from the rear and in the depth areas.According to the disengagement process agreed to by India and China, the countries have started withdrawing their tanks and armoured personnel carriers completely from the southern bank of Pangong Tso.ThePrint had reported on&nbsp;&nbsp;that following marathon 16-and-a-half-hour-long corps commander-level talks, India and China had managed to break the “stalemate”. Further communication was held at the local commanders’ level to work out the modalities following the last round of corps commander talks.According to sources, the process agreed upon includes a series of steps, the first of which is to pull back the armoured elements. The tanks had been deployed on the southern bank following the&nbsp; carried out by Indian forces on the night of 29-30 August last year. The tanks had been placed dangerously close to each other — with just a few feet of space between them.Sources said there is no pull-back of frontline troops from the heights on the southern bank. However, eventually, the troops will come down if the disengagement process moves smoothly and People’s Liberation Army personnel also move back. On the northern bank of the lake, the thinning down of troops has begun.ThePrint had also&nbsp;&nbsp;that India and China are inching closer to a possible resolution, with both sides discussing a proposal for disengagement.According to this proposal, the Chinese are to move back from the Finger 4 area on the northern bank of Pangong Tso to beyond Finger 8, but this area will become a no-go zone for both sides.Strategic sources, meanwhile, said the disengagement will happen over a period of time, and while “hectic” backchannel talks are going on at the diplomatic level, India is also waiting for the right kind of messaging to come from the Central Military Commission (CMC). It is that the CCP and the government in China maintain their control over the military.Pointing to the similar disengagement moves made by the Chinese twice before, and the fact that the PLA did not move from all areas, the sources said Chinese troops have to move from the depth areas as well as the heights, and only then will an official process of disengagement begin.Post that, the process of de-escalation will start, in which the troops on both sides will go back to their original posts where they were before April 2020, and “restore status quo”.External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar had, last month, proposed ‘’ to stabilise and repair India’s bilateral ties with China.In an article published in Wednesday, China’s Ambassador to India Sun Weidong wrote that the boundary issue between the countries should be put in an “appropriate place”, and that differences must be addressed “in a rational and constructive manner”, while not allowing “our differences to become disputes”.(With inputs from Nayanima Basu)(This report has been updated with new information)Also read:&nbsp;Support Our JournalismIndia needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking .Lovely that govt is wary of the Chinese stealth. Yes let them move from the depths n the heights. Thank you for the article.I hope that the Modi government does not allow Kailash Range to be vacated. In no time, the chinese PLA will occupy it. Such a blunder would amount to what Indira Gandhi did in 1973 treaty with Bhutto – handing back everything won for India in the 1971 war.China was probably banking on India not standing up to her, in days of economic slowdown compounded by Covid, for giving her a bloody nose as in 1962 with minimum damage to herself.Most likely there will now be attempts from Chinese side at normalizing relation trade on the top of the agenda having realized ;1) India is no pushover of 1962.2) A short war at those heights cannot be a winner for China, going beyond that takes us into deterrence area.3) An open market of 132 cr. with purchasing capacity can only be ignored out of stupidity.Without a word or an official statement, there appears to be a general aversion any thing Chinese, which was obvious in the markets particularly during the festive season.The Chinese have tested us out, let us see what lessons they take from thatWonderful.Comments are closed.Substance of Print, Reach of DigitalContact us:Copyright © 2022 Printline Media Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.&nbsp;

Sign inWelcome! Log into your accountPassword recoveryRecover your passwordA password will be e-mailed to you.Text Size:A-A+New Delhi: Nearly nine months after India and China got embroiled in their worst border tensions since the , both sides began a phased disengagement from the southern and northern banks of the Pangong Tso in Ladakh Wednesday.The news first emerged when Senior Colonel Wu Qian, spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of National Defence, issued a written statement, saying: “The Chinese and Indian frontline troops at the southern and northern bank of the Pangong Tso Lake...

India, China begin fresh disengagement, but ‘trust deficit means it’ll be a long process’

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS