Name: Tennessee Bill to Make 'Offensive' Nonconsensual Photos Illegal
Brand: petapixel.com
SKU: petapixel-com-6
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Tennessee Bill to Make 'Offensive' Nonconsensual Photos Illegal

preview

Tennessee state lawmakers working together with the Sullivan County District Attorney’s Office have introduced a bill to the state legislature that seeks to expand what is covered by “unlawful” photography. The new law focuses on a photographer’s supposed malicious intent. At present, the state law says that anyone out in public (even at such places as a gas station or supermarket) has no reasonable expectation of privacy, and as such nonconsensual photography is not illegal. But after the results of a case last year, there are attempts to expand what is deemed unlawful photography to include intent. A court of appeals unlawful photography charges against a Sullivan County man last year. This was after the defendant was originally found guilty after taking what the report calls “close up” photos of women in a store in 2016. “Under the prior law, if you were someplace like Walmart, out shopping, pumping gas, you didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy in those areas,” says Assistant District Attorney William Harper. “If someone came up and took a picture of your intimate part, there was no crime because of the fact of where you were.” This new law would target those who are taking “embarrassing” or “offensive” images of people in public but would apparently not target general public photography. This new bill, , would make it illegal to take a photo for the purpose of “sexual gratification or arousal.” This would apply to photos that would offend or embarrass the subject or are focused specifically on an “intimate” part of the body. Rep. John Crawford (R-Kingsport) and Sen. Jon Lundberg (R-Bristol) introduced the legislation in the legislature’s most recent session.Lundberg told News Channel 11 that he wanted to be really careful with the language of the bill, as he did not want people to think it would affect generally-accepted photography. Instead, the focus of the bill would be on the photographer’s “intent.” “I don’t want people to think, hey, if you’re outside and you take a picture of a park and there’s women, men in there, that’s not illegal,” he says. “What’s a clear distinction in here, is the intent of why that photo was taken.” According to the new bill, those found guilty of its violation would face a Class A misdemeanor if the offense was against an adult and a Class D felony if committed against a minor. “And if the jury finds it was taken for sexual gratification, that’s what elevates it to an illegal act,” says Lundberg. If the law passes, it would go into effect on July 1 of 2021. (via ) Image Credits: Header image by .,, , , , , , , ,Related ArticlesDiscussionLoad CommentsPlease enable JavaScript to view theTrending Articles

Tennessee state lawmakers working together with the Sullivan County District Attorney’s Office have introduced a bill to the state legislature that seeks to expand what is covered by “unlawful” photography. The new law focuses on a photographer’s supposed malicious intent. At present, the state law says that anyone out in public (even at such places as a gas station or supermarket) has no reasonable expectation of privacy, and as such nonconsensual photography is not illegal. But after the results of a case last year, there are attempts to expand what is deemed unlawful photography to...

public

Jaron Schneider

petapixel.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

Tennessee Bill to Make 'Offensive' Nonconsensual Photos Illegal

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS