Name: SpaceX Starship Test Ends in Spectacular Explosion, Again | Digital Trends
Brand: digitaltrends.com
SKU: digitaltrends-com-19
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

SpaceX Starship Test Ends in Spectacular Explosion, Again | Digital Trends

preview

Starship | SN9 | High-Altitude Flight TestThere was a strong feeling of déjà vu about SpaceX’s second Starship prototype rocket test on Tuesday, February 2. Why? Because, just like the previous high-altitude test flight, it crashed and burned upon landing.Powered by its three Raptor engines, the “SN9” prototype of SpaceX’s next-generation rocket roared off the launchpad in Boca Chica, Texas, at 12:25 p.m. PT, reaching its 32,800-feet target altitude at just past the four-minute mark.On its descent, the 160-foot-tall booster again performed the all-important flip maneuver in preparation for an upright landing, but, in December 2020, the rocket came down too hard, and at a slight angle, causing it to explode in a spectacular fireball.“We had, again, another great flight up,” SpaceX engineer John Insprucker said on the company’s livestream of the test flight, adding, “We’ve just got to work on that landing a little bit.”The Starship prototype descended under active aerodynamic control, achieved via independent movement of the vehicle’s two forward and two aft flaps actuated by an onboard flight computer that also controls Starship’s altitude and landing procedure.Once SpaceX nails its Starship technology, the team will launch the spacecraft — which also acts as a second-stage booster — atop the powerful first-stage Super Heavy rocket, a 31-Raptor engine first-stage booster that’s also still under development.The ultimate goal is to deploy the Starship and Super Heavy rocket as a fully reusable space transportation system, carrying as many as 100 people and cargo to Earth orbit, the moon, Mars, and possibly beyond.“All told, another great [flight],” Insprucker said later, “[As a] reminder, this is a test flight — the second time we’ve launched Starship in this configuration. We’ve got a lot of good data, and achieved the primary objective to demonstrate control of the vehicle and the subsonic reentry.”The S10 prototype is already in place at SpaceX’s Boca Chica facility in readiness for the third high-altitude test flight, which could occur in the coming weeks. Ahead of it, the team will be taking a long, hard look at its gathered data and presumably making some careful adjustments to give the booster a better chance of surviving its next outing.

Starship | SN9 | High-Altitude Flight TestThere was a strong feeling of déjà vu about SpaceX’s second Starship prototype rocket test on Tuesday, February 2. Why? Because, just like the previous high-altitude test flight, it crashed and burned upon landing.Powered by its three Raptor engines, the “SN9” prototype of SpaceX’s next-generation rocket roared off the launchpad in Boca Chica, Texas, at 12:25 p.m. PT, reaching its 32,800-feet target altitude at just past the four-minute mark.On its descent, the 160-foot-tall booster again performed the all-important flip maneuver in preparation for...

public

Trevor Mogg

digitaltrends.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

SpaceX Starship Test Ends in Spectacular Explosion, Again | Digital Trends

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS