The entire media sensationalism of the Mueller investigation is presented again, in the first paragraph: "Special Counsel Robert Mueller reiterated that his investigation did not 'totally exonerate' Donald Trump, as the president has stated. Further contradicting Trump, Mueller also said he did not find that the president did not obstruct justice." It is not the role of a potential prosecutor to undertake an investigation to exonerate. Prosecutors make, in this case recommend, indictments. If the issue goes to trial a judge and/or jury will do any appropriate exonerating.

While the author recaps the tone and context of the recent Mueller hearing, the author has a clear stance on this issue and repeats it often. He even references another opinion article, written by himself, to prove claims that Trump is a liar, etc. Many and better sources are needed to describe the different ways Trump is being a liar, as the clickbait headline states.

The Mueller report had nothing but suppositions, innuendo, and inferences in it. Mueller's testimony reflected this as he could not commit to anything, refused to acknowledge sources, and was otherwise vague about EVERYTHING. The Atlantic article completely ignores all this and uses the same MSM tactics of inference, suppositions and innuendo in place of facts. A real BS article.