A fine article about the recent updates in museums renaming things that were originally named after the Sackler family. I wish there was more attention payed to the opioid epidemic and the actions of the family than to whether things are still named after them.

I found this to be a very well-written and balanced report on the recent movement to remove the Sackler name from museums worldwide. I found it balanced because it explained the reasons why some museums are contractually unable to change the name, why some museums think renaming their exhibits is actually dishonest, and how many of the named exhibits come from "Arthur M. Sackler, who died before OxyContin was created, donated 1,000 objects and $4 million toward the construction of the museum."