Excellent writing and paraphrasing by known names and organizations supportive of NRA, but source materials are not documented, so lessens the viability of position posed in the article.

While this article started out as speculation, I realized it was the lack of reliable sources (and links to) that is the true missing piece to this article's credibility. These events might have happened but without linking to some sort of record of the fact, the author could be making up or skewing information and the reader would have no way of knowing. This article relies strictly on quotes from NRA leaders and politicians.

This article uses inflammatory language to paint a particularly negative light of the situation. There are quotes in the piece that contradict the claims of the article directly, and most of the piece that paints a negative picture is baseless speculation.

I trust Politico, parts of articles have been sourced well and those evil bastards in the GOP and there minions will do anything, anything to get there village idiot elected