Name: Apple reportedly drags its feet when dealing with chronic China labor law offenders | AppleInsider
Brand: appleinsider.com
SKU: appleinsider-com-67
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Apple reportedly drags its feet when dealing with chronic China labor law offenders | AppleInsider

preview

&nbsp;By2 days ago&nbsp;&nbsp;A new report sheds some light on how Apple deals with companies that slack on enforcing labor laws in China, alleging that if corrective actions will impact Apple's bottom line, they are slow to materialize — or may not happen at all. The report by The Information with the saga of cable and port manufacturer Suyin. In 2013, Apple demanded that it stop using underage labor to manufacture HDMI and USB ports. The company reportedly agreed to do so, but an audit by Apple three months later found more underage workers in the factories. Apple stopped giving Suyin new business at that point. However, the report also alleges that it took three more years for Apple to completely cut ties with the company. An unnamed former employee told The Information that the long time it took Apple to cut ties with the company was because of a lack of sourcing of quality parts and products from other companies at the time. The report also cites Apple's dealings with smartphone glass manufacturer Biel Crystal. The saga with Biel also goes back to 2013, when an activist group accused Biel of labor violations and safety issues. Apple investigated, and found issues with the company's practices. Specifically, mechanical and chemical hazards existed were compounded by a weak safety and health culture in the company. At the time, Apple issued a 90-day timeline for compliance. According to "an ex-Apple employee with direct knowledge of Biel's supplier responsibility record" cited in the report, Biel hadn't completed many of the tasks after a year had elapsed — and Apple continued sourcing iPhone glass from the company. Fearing a loss of business, Biel took some steps that Apple demanded. Following another watchdog report, Apple again audited conditions at the plant, finding only slight improvements to working conditions. When confronted, Biel executives reportedly told Apple that investments in better working conditions were only made to attempt to get more business from Apple, and further improvements weren't worth the investment. That business was lost to Lens Technology. , a report claimed that Lens Technology had used forced labor to manufacture iPhone glass. An Apple spokesperson denied that report, declaring that Lens Technology "has not received any labor transfers of Uighur workers from Xinjiang." The spokesperson added that the company has a "zero tolerance" policy for forced labor. Apple still sources glass from Biel. The report also brings up other labor abuses by Apple suppliers. Even after a reform of student labor use in 2012, reports continued to pop up. The report claims that Apple stepped back from demands about the banning of student labor after Foxconn objected, and it also notes that Quanta has refused Apple's request to reduce reliance on temporary workers. The report again cites unnamed "three former team members and a former senior Apple manager familiar with the company's operations in China" claiming that Apple never removed any supplier for repeated law violations, because requiring suppliers to comply or cutting suppliers out completely would have created additional costs for Apple, and potentially delayed product releases. Lens Technology, like Biel, supplies nearly the entire tech industry with glass. Apple has no exclusive technology suppliers, and its main suppliers Foxconn, Wistron, and others, manufacture electronics and components for every tech company, including Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft, Dell, and others. This leads to a massive supply chain, with millions of laborers, and thousands of assembly lines. Part of the issue, according to The Information, is that Apple's supply chain alone is so massive, even the 50,000 interviews that Apple cited in its latest responsibility report is a minute fraction of the entire effort. The report estimates that there are between 1.4 million and 1.8 million workers in China associated with Apple's supply chain. A great deal of the audits and assessments that Apple demands are performed by self-assessments. Apple's procurement employees, who visit factories more often than supplier responsibility audit teams, are tasked with keeping an eye on things, and point out problems. This is compounded by friction between the supplier responsibility team and procurement employees, according to former Apple employees that were "senior managers involved in the company's supply chain" cited by The Information. "On your performance reviews, you were supposed to report how much money you helped Apple save," one former longtime Apple procurement employee said in the report. "You couldn't report that you saved Apple from a PR black eye."AppleInsider has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased through affiliate links.These partnerships do not influence our editorial content.&nbsp;&nbsp;Do the right thing Apple!!! &nbsp;Bad bad bad!!said:Do the right thing Apple!!! &nbsp;Bad bad bad!!What exactly is “the right thing”?In reading the article, it looks like Apple attempted to affect change but was stymied in certain situations when they had few suppliers.There is always room for improvement but I think Apple probably does a better job monitoring the conditions of it’s workers in it’s contracted supply lines than most other companies. &nbsp;The stories of workers in the Bangladesh clothing factories, South China sea fisheries are horrendous and I suspect most manufactured goods that we don’t think twice about in our daily consumption (especially food and clothing) are made in worse conditions.&nbsp;So what is the alternative? &nbsp;Buy from companies that manufacture budget electronics which conduct no oversight whatsoever when they make slipshod products that have short lives and accelerate e-waste and human misery?That’s not a good option. &nbsp;One needs to be mindful about our actions as consumers and make the best informed decisions we can. &nbsp;For me that still means buying Apple products and using them as long as possible and disposing of them wisely.Truth is that Apple would be f*cked if they straight up just left China; and if they don't leave China they will keep on finding human rights issues.So what to do?At what point will we consumers walk away from Apple if they don't move more of their production out of China?Aaaaand… even if they move their production out of China, does that really help if the factories are still owned by Chinese companies. (Like with the AirPods Max:&nbsp;.)said:In reading the article, it looks like Apple attempted to affect change but was stymied in certain situations when they had few suppliers.There is always room for improvement but I think Apple probably does a better job monitoring the conditions of it’s workers in it’s contracted supply lines than most other companies. &nbsp;The stories of workers in the Bangladesh clothing factories, South China sea fisheries are horrendous and I suspect most manufactured goods that we don’t think twice about in our daily consumption (especially food and clothing) are made in worse conditions.&nbsp;So what is the alternative? &nbsp;Buy from companies that manufacture budget electronics which conduct no oversight whatsoever when they make slipshod products that have short lives and accelerate e-waste and human misery?That’s not a good option. &nbsp;One needs to be mindful about our actions as consumers and make the best informed decisions we can. &nbsp;For me that still means buying Apple products and using them as long as possible and disposing of them wisely.Well, yeah. A lot of this read as though the writer was a little desperate. When I read it, I thought that Apple had balanced things as well as it could without impacting customers.&nbsp;Because you can guarantee that if we started getting poor quality components &nbsp;or couldn’t get our gadget fix, we’d stop giving a shit about slave labour in pretty short order.&nbsp;Please enable JavaScript to view comments&nbsp;Samsung is anticipated to reveal its Galaxy S21, S21+, and S21 Ultra smartphones in January, but how will the new generation compare to the current crop of iPhones? We look at the rumors for Apple's biggest rival.A documentary from Britain's Prince Harry intended for release on Apple TV+ in 2020 is now expected in the spring of 2021, a delay caused through a move to the United States, ceasing official Royal Family duties, and the COVID-19 pandemic.Ringing in the New Year, AppleInsider readers can score the best M1 MacBook Pro deals that knock $100 to $200 off every single 13-inch M1 MacBook Pro on top of $60 off AppleCare. These discounts deliver the cheapest prices available on the Apple Silicon laptops.Losing a loved one is hard enough without feeling like Apple is fighting you. Here's what you can about someone's iPhone, their iTunes content, and that Family Sharing you all rely on when a loved one dies.The developer behind the macOS app Amphetamine was warned by Apple that the app was going to be purged from Mac App Store for violating one of the App Store Guidelines due to its name — but Apple reversed its course after the developer appealed the matter.Apollo Neuro is a wearable that may vibrate you into calmer or more energized states, but its steep price tag may limit its reach.The New Year brings about an exclusive deal on Apple's latest Mac mini, with the M1 model now in stock and $50 off when equipped with a 512GB SSD.The introduction of MagSafe in the iPhone 12 range has cemented wireless charging as a core technology for smartphones, but not everyone knows how the technology works. Here's what you need to know about wireless charging systems and how Apple uses them.

&nbsp;By2 days ago&nbsp;&nbsp;A new report sheds some light on how Apple deals with companies that slack on enforcing labor laws in China, alleging that if corrective actions will impact Apple's bottom line, they are slow to materialize — or may not happen at all. The report by The Information with the saga of cable and port manufacturer Suyin. In 2013, Apple demanded that it stop using underage labor to manufacture HDMI and USB ports. The company reportedly agreed to do so, but an audit by Apple three months later found more underage workers in the factories. Apple stopped giving Suyin new...

Apple reportedly drags its feet when dealing with chronic China labor law offenders | AppleInsider

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS