This is a fairly unbiased report, minus some commonly agreed on factual mistakes that deal with the context of the 2016 election. The new information covered in the report is credible and detailed.

I like that this article does highlight the scale at which these campaigns occur at (19 accounts) in relation to how many accounts are on Instagram and how many use anti-Trump rhetoric generally (52,000 accounts). I wish there was more information on how they determine if the accounts are coordinated and what they mean by that. Is it one person/entity or a group of accounts controlled by multiple people who are coordinating their actions?

Great article with supporting evidence from a third-party study by Ghost Data. Link to the actual report is in the article allowing readers like myself to really dive deeper into this issue. It is with no doubt, a similar response to that of Facebook during the election.

This report feels unbiased. I trust it.