There is a lot of "Reuters reports" in this article because it is mostly a bullet point review of Reuters original article (I think this one: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-tech-alphabet-exclusive/exclusive-google-suspends-some-business-with-huawei-after-trump-blacklist-source-idUSKCN1SP0NB). More annoyingly they make it seem like they have a hyper link to the original Reuters article but it just links to another one of Business Insiders articles on the topic.

This is actually newsworthy information. There is no opinion inserted, no political agenda being pushed, and the article contains factual data with some educated guesses about upcoming problems based on application of the actions taken by Google.

An exaggerated title with an article that copies Reuters original story by quite a bit.

Google has been dealt with serious fines in recent months. They are probably trying to distance themselves from future issues.

factual, but presents google in a bad light when it's mostly an administrative move that hits businesses irrespective... example Qualcomm or other US business names have not been mentioned, when they will also suffer from same blockade (for lack of a better word)

Reporting events as they happen with no analyses or in-depth dive.

Focus on facts, not politics, good for learning what this could mean for you

While this article copied much of the Reuters report, Business Insider did a clean job in displaying the top impacts it would have on Android users. While the title is a bit "dramatic" the information provided is quick and succinct to my knowledge.

Trustworthy by slightly dramatised / exaggerated title.

Informational and clear

It's accurate information

Seems trust-able especially because of mentioned other competent news sources and public confirmations by Google

Seems pretty factual.

It's going to be interesting what the implications for Android competition are going to be "'If it turns out we can no longer use [Android], we will be ready and have our plan B,' Yu said."