Name: Lost in the middle: Will the arrogant certainty of "centrism" destroy America?
Brand: salon.com
SKU: salon-com-243
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Lost in the middle: Will the arrogant certainty of "centrism" destroy America?

preview

Joe Biden, Bill Clinton (circa 1992) and Barack Obama (circa 2008)--The philosopher George Santayana famously said, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." One insight to draw from Santayana's oft-repeated aphorism is that the repetition of clichés is likely to have little effect, given the widespread tendency to ignore&nbsp;pithy advice and continue&nbsp;witlessly&nbsp;recycling, recreating&nbsp;and reliving&nbsp;history.Over the past few weeks, the Republican Party has proven itself hostile to freedom and democracy; its&nbsp;merciful incompetence the only thing saving whatever&nbsp;remains of our republic from the fascist insurrection of a con&nbsp;man. The absurdity of the cast members —&nbsp;from Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell to their incoherent Michigan "witness" and of course Donald Trump himself — have&nbsp;made the entire fiasco seem more like a satirical film&nbsp;than political reality. At the other multiplex on the Democratic side of town, every screen is running previews for the third version of a box office smash, "Centrist Failure," with Joe Biden taking&nbsp;over the leading role from his more charismatic predecessors, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.The 1990s original had audiences entranced by a seductive Southerner, Clinton, who under the guidance of the&nbsp;Democratic Leadership Council&nbsp;rebranded his party&nbsp;as the "new Democrats," which apparently translates into "Republicans." Clinton cut social programs, ended "welfare as we know it" by making single mothers work low-income jobs without child care, signed a massively destructive and draconian&nbsp;crime&nbsp;bill into law, deregulated the financial industry, and approved NAFTA. Democrats throughout the mediocre commentariat largely applauded, on the grounds that right-wing policies with a friendlier face were the only way Democrats could win or maintain power, and prevent another Reagan-like figure from seizing control of the country.&nbsp;After all, they asked, wouldn't you rather have Clinton, with his paeans to social liberalism, administrative proficiency&nbsp;and obvious intelligence, than George H.W. Bush? Sure —&nbsp;but then along came&nbsp;Bush's son, holding the White House door open for the ghoulish likes of Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, and proving himself far worse than his father. Two horrific wars, the criminal ineptitude of the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, and the financial crash created fertile conditions for radical reform, but instead the "hopey-changey" Obama administration committed the first error of national politics. They failed to act on the keen insight of the aforementioned Cheney, who once told a defiant Republican senator, "We don't negotiate with ourselves."The&nbsp;&nbsp;—&nbsp;hardly an advocate of socialism or Marxism —&nbsp;recently reported that from 1975 to 2018, the top 1 percent, taking advantage of tax policies, corporate welfare&nbsp;and other built-in benefits, took in $47 trillion — that's&nbsp;trillion, with 12 zeroes –&nbsp;that otherwise would have been distributed among the bottom 90 percent.&nbsp;Naomi Klein explains brilliantly in her book&nbsp;"" that catastrophes and crises typically exacerbate inequality in various ways: They offer&nbsp;multinational corporations an opportunity to force out small competitors, convince governments to deregulate or&nbsp;surrender public land and other areas of the commons, and accelerate urban gentrification and residential segregation. It is hardly surprising then that COVID-19 has only enhanced these hideous developments. According to&nbsp;, 900 companies that accepted billions in Paycheck Protection Program loans&nbsp;still laid off a cumulative total of 90,000 workers.American life, for most citizens, has become a never-ending struggle, with essentials like health care, child care, and high-quality education all but inaccessible. As a&nbsp;&nbsp;made clear for those sitting in the back, even many Americans who appear to have it made in the shade, earning relatively high salaries and owning substantial homes, still live paycheck to paycheck, frightened that an unexpected expense will drown them in debt.There's "stone cold rage in the hinterlands," Warren Haynes shouts in the Gov't Mule song,&nbsp;&nbsp;capturing the way that entire American&nbsp;towns have collapsed into conditions that resemble war zone. Small villages that once had a vibrant communal center made possible by family farming, light manufacturing&nbsp;employment&nbsp;and small retail business have become ghost towns, without much hope for middle-class&nbsp;or even working-class resurrection. In a previously unprecedented and horrific development,&nbsp;&nbsp;—&nbsp;primarily meaning those caused by suicide, drug overdose, alcoholism and obesity —&nbsp;began to rise in the United States a few years ago, especially among men in rural areas.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The inhabitants of these desolate and deprived outposts have accepted a theory, albeit a terrible and dangerous one, to explain their demise. Arlie Russell Hochschild, a sociologist who spent five years conducting lengthy interviews with poor people in the Louisiana bayou,&nbsp;:Hochschild is not seeking to&nbsp;excuse the obvious racism embodied in this narrative, or to&nbsp;deny its pervasive influence on whites who support Donald Trump and other xenophobic Republicans. She only explains that nearly everyone she interviewed articulated some version of this "deep story," to use her words — "a story in which you lift away facts and moral judgment and just find the story that feels&nbsp;true."&nbsp;A massively funded apparatus of creative thinkers and skillful personalities inundate voters with right-wing propaganda on a daily basis, creating an alternative universe in which "facts and moral judgment" drift away to make room for the hateful scapegoating of all the people Hochschild identifies above.&nbsp;What is the centrist "deep story" that might respond to this? Is there even a centrist hypothesis to explain and alter the continual decay of American life?&nbsp;Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently courted the scorn of centrists for stating the obvious by calling Biden's vision for the country&nbsp;&nbsp;None of the attacks on her even tried to offer an alternate&nbsp;assessment of Biden's prospective&nbsp;agenda. Of course there is time for the incoming president&nbsp;to communicate with more clarity and specificity, but progressives in Congress are only expressing the reasonable concern&nbsp;that 20 months after Biden&nbsp;announced&nbsp;his presidential candidacy, no one can honestly describe his overarching vision for governance, reform&nbsp;and public policy.The progressive or leftist politics that Ocasio-Cortez represents at least offers&nbsp;Americans, especially those who suffer from poverty and despair, a "deep story." The leftist deep story has the benefit of being true. It doesn't require adherents to overlook relevant facts or suspend all moral judgment. It makes no room for racism or nativism. Instead it accurately surveys the reality on the ground, from the South Side of Chicago to the swamps of Louisiana, and offers real, actionable solutions, which double as an effective counterargument against the nationalism of the fast-rising far right.&nbsp;As psychiatrist Jonathan Metzl demonstrates in his book, "," many white people in "heartland" America are so deeply committed to&nbsp;"racial resentment" that they will actively vote and fight against their own access to medicine, education, clean air&nbsp;and better wages. Many of the poor people Metzl interviewed essentially took the position that it is preferable to starve than to endorse policies that might better the lot of&nbsp;Blacks or "illegal immigrants."&nbsp;Of course progressives shouldn't&nbsp;assume that they will convert Trump followers to democratic socialism with a few Bernie Sanders speeches and John Mellencamp records. They may, however, begin to shift&nbsp;some political support with active and aggressive engagement throughout the country, explaining exactly why their "deep story" is better than racial inculpation and division.&nbsp;As for the centrists, they guarantee failure,&nbsp;offering exactly nothing other than their own arrogance and provably false prescriptions&nbsp;to ordinary people&nbsp;confused and outraged over the decline of their communities and the precarity of their own lives.Centrists insist that "moderation" is the only&nbsp;sensible approach to national politics in a large and diverse country. They might have an argument worthy of consideration if the world's problems were moderate. But the impending climate apocalypse is not moderate, nor is the dramatic and worsening economic inequality, on a scale not seen since the Gilded Age. Those things cannot be addressed with compromises or half-measures.Centrist equivocation will only alienate Americans from each other, while emboldening the forces of right-wing extremism, ignorance&nbsp;and hatred. From the 1980s onward,&nbsp;through recession, war&nbsp;terrorism, and ecological catastrophe, this story has repeated itself time and time again. How many times will the&nbsp;"sensible" centrists have to watch the country descend into chaos&nbsp;before they&nbsp;learn its lessons?is the author of "" (Bloomsbury Publishing) and "" (University Press of Kentucky, 2015).MORE FROM

Joe Biden, Bill Clinton (circa 1992) and Barack Obama (circa 2008)--The philosopher George Santayana famously said, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." One insight to draw from Santayana's oft-repeated aphorism is that the repetition of clichés is likely to have little effect, given the widespread tendency to ignore&nbsp;pithy advice and continue&nbsp;witlessly&nbsp;recycling, recreating&nbsp;and reliving&nbsp;history.Over the past few weeks, the Republican Party has proven itself hostile to freedom and democracy; its&nbsp;merciful incompetence the only thing...

public

David Masciotra is the author of several books, including I Am Somebody: Why Jesse Jackson Matters and a forthcoming examination of the politics of exurbia and suburbia. He has also written for The New Republic, The Progressive, and many other publications. He lives in Indiana.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/author/david-masciotra/

David Masciotra

The original online source for news, politics and entertainment | Find us on Instagram & TikTok: salonofficial | Subscribe to our newsletters linked in bio.

Lost in the middle: Will the arrogant certainty of "centrism" destroy America?

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS