Name: Court alters police rules for warrantless vehicle searches
Brand: apnews.com
SKU: apnews-com-287
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Court alters police rules for warrantless vehicle searches

preview

AP NEWS https://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-constitutions-courts-6421b381e8c049d18368c4fb69bc2d15Click to copyhttps://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-constitutions-courts-6421b381e8c049d18368c4fb69bc2d15Click to copyRelated topicsHARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Police must have probable cause as well as “exigent circumstances” in order to legally search a vehicle without a warrant, a divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.The 4-3 decision said the state constitution’s privacy protections are greater than the U.S. Constitution’s and that those protections extend to vehicles. The court overruled its own 2014 decision that probable cause alone was sufficient, given that vehicles are inherently mobile. “Difficulties in clarifying the scope of the exigency requirement will lead to debates about what exactly the Pennsylvania Constitution demands in a given situation. But so what?” Justice Christine Donohue, referring to the state’s constitutional language on searches.ADVERTISEMENT“The long history of and its heightened privacy protections do not permit us to carry forward a bright-line rule that gives short shrift to citizens’ privacy rights,” Donohue wrote for the majority.Exigent circumstances might include a belief that people are in danger or that important evidence is about to disappear. Donohue said “the universe of qualifying ‘exigent circumstances’ is impossible to define with precision,” but they must go beyond that vehicles have wheels and can be driven away.Greg Rowe with the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association said the existence of “exigent circumstances” in warrantless searches will be made on a case-by-case basis.“Based on our initial review, we believe this decision will dramatically change the legal interpretation of how warrantless searches of automobiles are conducted in Pennsylvania and could greatly diminish the clarity and predictability in this area of the law,” Rowe said.In a that did not involve a vehicle, the U.S. Supreme Court listed as exigent circumstances the need to provide emergency aid, hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect or the prospect of the destruction of evidence.Donohue’s opinion was joined by three of the other four Democrats on the court. Both Republican justices and Democratic Justice Kevin Dougherty dissented, arguing the 2014 precedent should stand.“When we become untethered from our previous decisions, we instantly implicate this court’s credibility and our ability to effectively adjudicate the many types of cases upon which litigants look to us for guidance,” Republican Justice Sallie Mundy.She said the previous standard of probable cause alone to justify a warrantless vehicle search “offered a bright-line rule already in effect” and “deferred to the needs of those we entrust with the difficult job of policing.”The court sent the Philadelphia case that prompted the decision back to county court to more fully examine whether exigent circumstances existed. In that case, the defendant had been convicted of possession of heroin with intent to deliver after a 2016 vehicle stop in which drugs were recovered from a locked metal box inside the vehicle he had been driving.

AP NEWS https://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-constitutions-courts-6421b381e8c049d18368c4fb69bc2d15Click to copyhttps://apnews.com/article/pennsylvania-constitutions-courts-6421b381e8c049d18368c4fb69bc2d15Click to copyRelated topicsHARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Police must have probable cause as well as “exigent circumstances” in order to legally search a vehicle without a warrant, a divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.The 4-3 decision said the state constitution’s privacy protections are greater than the U.S. Constitution’s and that those protections extend to vehicles. The court...

public

Mark Scolforo

Advancing the power of facts, globally 🌎

apnews.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

Court alters police rules for warrantless vehicle searches

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS