Does a good job presenting credible refutations to the points raised in the NY Post article, but unfortunately also dabbles in its own sensational narrative by continually referring to the NY Post as a “tabloid” - along with a general tone that feels particularly biased against a competing news outlet despite its use of good factual content

This is a very balanced and detailed breakdown of the various claims that the Presidential Debate moderator was biased in favor of Democrats. The fact-check is very nuanced, admitting when there are conflicts of interests but outlining with evidence why some claims are baseless. This is an example of a very thoughtful, nonpartisan fact-check.