Name: Machines Beat Humans on a Reading Test. But Do They Understand? | Quanta Magazine
Brand: quantamagazine.org
SKU: quantamagazine-org-5
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Machines Beat Humans on a Reading Test. But Do They Understand? | Quanta Magazine

preview

We care about your data, and we'd like to use cookies to give you a smooth browsing experience. Please agree and read more about our .AgreeA tool known as BERT can now beat humans on advanced reading-comprehension tests. But it's also revealed how far AI has to go. October 17, 2019In the fall of 2017, , a computational linguist at New York University, figured that computers still weren’t very good at understanding the written word. Sure, they had become decent at simulating that understanding in certain narrow domains, like automatic translation or sentiment analysis (for example,...

public

quantamagazine.org

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

Machines Beat Humans on a Reading Test. But Do They Understand? | Quanta Magazine

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS