Name: I just published: “Follow The Science? There's No Science Behind Any Of This”
Brand: substack.com
SKU: substack-com-163
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

I just published: “Follow The Science? There's No Science Behind Any Of This”

preview

SubscribeHey free subscribers!I just published another report exclusively for paid subscribers, titled: “.”The pro-restrictionist “public health experts” who claim to be “following the science” on COVID-19 are not, in fact, following the science, because the science would tell them to immediate cease and desist from the madness they are promoting.&nbsp;Over the course of the past year, panic peddling “public health experts” in the United States and abroad have revealed themselves as thoughtless, hyper-political, egomaniacal, corrupt quack doctors and&nbsp;, who are propped up by an elite-in-name-only society of like-minded activists, who justify their political advocacy for tyranny with a CDC/WHO/Pfizer/etc credential stamp.In the piece, I discuss the data that shows how “following the science” means ending lockdowns and mask mandates as soon as possible.&nbsp;to&nbsp;read the&nbsp;now!© 2020 Jordan Schachtel. See , andThis site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please or unblock scripts

SubscribeHey free subscribers!I just published another report exclusively for paid subscribers, titled: “.”The pro-restrictionist “public health experts” who claim to be “following the science” on COVID-19 are not, in fact, following the science, because the science would tell them to immediate cease and desist from the madness they are promoting.&nbsp;Over the course of the past year, panic peddling “public health experts” in the United States and abroad have revealed themselves as thoughtless, hyper-political, egomaniacal, corrupt quack doctors and&nbsp;, who are propped up by an...

public

Jordan Schachtel

A place for independent writing. We make it simple for a writer to start a paid newsletter.

substack.com

Credible

Speculation

Anecdotal Evidence

Generalization

Stacking the Deck

Appeal to Authority

Straw Man

Slippery Slope

Emotional Appeal

Red Herring

False Dilemma

Illogical

Moral Equivalency

Ad Hominem

Correlation w/o Causation

Semantics

Begging the Question

Faulty Analogy

Non Sequitur

Bandwagon

Dogmatism

Failing Occam's Razor

Biased

Pure Opinion

Hit Piece

Racial Bias

National Bias

Religious Bias

Financial Incentive

Political Agenda

Gender Bias

Misused Image/Video

Study Misinterpreted

Mistake

Misused Term

Science Misrepresented

Factual Error

Satire

Surface Level

Lack of Reliable Sources

Sensational

Not Credible

Investigative

Balanced

Well Sourced

Great Context

sports

entertainment

U.S.

international

business

technology

science

culture

politics

media

health

I just published: “Follow The Science? There's No Science Behind Any Of This”

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS