March 21, 202033 words
Published: March 21, 2020 | 33 words
Copyright © 2022 Penske Business Media, LLC. All Rights reserved.adTo help keep your account secure, please log-in again.You are no longer onsite at your organization. Please log in.For assistance, contact your corporate administrator....
Scores for this article.
Percentage of critic and public trust in this article.
Investigative2
critic score
public score
critic score
9 reviews
public score
53 reviews
critic score
1 reviews
public score
7 reviews
CRITIC REVIEWS
Investigative
March 22, 2020
A straightforward look at the referenced subject matter. Despite its brevity the piece presents both sides of the issue in a clear and concise manner. There is bit of authorial bias present but overall this does not detract from the credibility of the work. The quoting and commentary reflect the seriousness of the discussion and provide valuable context. A distressing topic to be sure but the Author presents the whole in a generally even-handed manner which is both interesting and informative. A well-written and worthwhile read. Four stars!
March 22, 2020
PUBLIC REVIEWS
Balanced
March 22, 2020
A credible and clear exposition of facts and potential consequences related to using this crisis to encroach on civil rights.
March 22, 2020
Political Agenda
March 24, 2020
This was actually not bad until the unhinged, unfounded, and accusatory diatribe about the Trump administration at the end.
March 24, 2020
Investigative
March 22, 2020
This user only left a rating
March 22, 2020
Great Context
March 22, 2020
This is a pretty good article until we reach the author's conclusion in the final paragraph. Author Peter Wade assigns intent to the proposed policy change saying "the Trump administration is taking steps to hold more people in prisons for an undetermined amount of time — showing their priority is not saving lives but giving themselves more power." I hate when writers assign intent to people's actions, especially in a case like this where they are stating that their intent is something else, to slow down the spread of COVID-19. If the author dis some digging and came up with evidence for his claim, that would be fantastic reporting. But that's not the case here.
March 22, 2020