Do you notice the problem? Quote: "Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday sent a letter to Nadler, the committee's chair, criticizing him for launching “fruitless partisan investigations” into President Trump while ignoring the threat of Antifa. The letter called on Nadler to denounce “left-wing violent extremism” and convene a hearing to investigate the unrest engulfing a number of cities across the country." 𝗠𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗸𝘀: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗙𝗢𝗫 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 ‘𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀’ 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 ‘𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗮’ 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 ‘𝘃𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀’. 𝗧𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 ‘𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀’ 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘃𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝗮𝘀 ‘𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗮’, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 ‘𝗮𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝗮’ 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗻 ‘𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁’. 𝗦𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 ‘𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀’, 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 ‘𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀’ 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗮𝗻 ‘𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁’. 𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗡𝗮𝘇𝗶 𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰: 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗺𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝘅𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁ꓤ𝘂𝗺𝗽’𝘀 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘃𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝘁. 𝗜𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘁, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘄𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗿𝗼𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘃𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁-𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗲𝗳𝘁-𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘂𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻. 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗯𝗼𝘁𝗵 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽𝘀. 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗴𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: 𝗗𝗼 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗻’𝘁? 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘃𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴. 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁-𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗹?

This article is not even false; it implies a falsehood that it does not state. At the end of July,a Democrat dismissed the significance of antifa violence in Portland: Austen ‘Fleccas’ Fletcher: “There’s violence across the whole country. Do you disavow the violence from Antifa? … that’s happening in Portland right now … there’s riots…” US Rep. Jerry Nadler: “That’s a myth that’s being spread only in Washington D. C.” Fletcher: “Antifa in Portland?” Nadler: “Yes.” Fauxnews pretends that the Director of the FBI has countered, in mid-September, designation of the right-wing caricature of antifa as fantasy: "we have any number of properly predicated investigations into what we would describe as violent anarchist extremists and some of those individuals self-identify with Antifa." Obviously, anarchists are anti-fascist. That "some violent anarchist extremists self-identify with Antifa" does not confirm Fauxnews' antifa fantasy (nor does it say much about antifa). Fauxnews doth protest too much. Merchants of doubt don't sell the truth. And Nadler is wrong! Fauxnews is spreading the myth of "Antifa in Portland" across the world.

I mean, this is about 80% quotes from senate hearings. There is virtually no journalist opinion included at all, in fact. Not sure why critics who actually read it would be so harsh, to be honest. Almost like they do not want people to read the synopsis of senate judiciary committe meetings where the director of the FBI was givibg testimony.

Would like to have more info on why Antifa is a terrorist organization. Once a member is identified how will they be prosecuted? Biden is against violence but certainly vague about what to do with the perpetrators. Democrats are afraid to damage their financial sources even if they are cause harm to society.