Name: Study claiming covid came from lab published by Bannon-linked groups
Brand: dailymail.co.uk
SKU: dailymail-co-uk-125
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

Study claiming covid came from lab published by Bannon-linked groups

preview

&nbsp;Tuesday, Sep 13th 2022| 428A Chinese defector's study claiming that Covid-19 was manufactured in a lab was published by groups founded by former Trump strategist Steve Bannon and a billionaire Beijing exile.&nbsp;The scientific paper, which has not been peer-reviewed, claims the disease was built by merging the genetic material of two bat coronaviruses and that a spike protein was edited to enhance its ability to latch onto human cells.Scientists have slammed the report published on Monday as 'unsubstantiated' and said it 'cannot be given any credibility.'The study was produced by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation, sister organisations which Bannon, 66, founded with 50-year-old Chinese fugitive Guo Wengui. The study was authored by&nbsp;Li-Meng Yan, who purports to be a former researcher at the &nbsp;School of Public Health, and who has recently appeared on Fox News in the US and ITV in the UK.Ms Yan's report has gained widespread public attention, being viewed more than 150,000 times since it was posted on the website Zenodo, which is operated by the European Organisation for Nuclear Research to promote open scientific data.Documents posted on the&nbsp;Rule of Law Society's website last year showed Bannon was the New York-based group's chairman, The Daily Beast reported.Neither the Rule of Law Society nor the Rule of Law Foundation appear to have published scientific or medical research before.Guo, a real-estate tycoon and member of Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club, pledged $100 million to the Rule of Law Society to be led by Bannon. The pair announced the endeavour in 2018 and&nbsp;Bannon told the New York Times that he would take no pay.&nbsp;The charities' stated mission is: 'To expose corruption, obstruction, illegality, brutality, false imprisonment, excessive sentencing, harassment, and inhumanity pervasive in the political, legal, business and financial systems of China.'Bannon and Guo have also worked together on G News, which publishes anti-Communist Part articles in both English and Chinese, and which has propagated the theory that coronavirus was manufactured in a lab.The theory was widely reported earlier this year and Trump suggested he had since intelligence reports to support the claims.Trump continued to make the allusions despite the US national intelligence director's office saying in April that the virus was 'not manmade or genetically modified.'The White House's chief coronavirus strategist, Dr Anthony Fauci, has also stated emphatically that the virus was not manufactured.sharesIn July, Bannon told the Mail on Sunday that spies were building a case against Beijing on the basis that the pandemic was caused by a leak from the Institute of Virology in Wuhan and that the subsequent cover-up was tantamount to 'pre-mediated murder.'But the timing of the Bannon-backed scientific study comes months after Mike Pompeo backed off from the lab idea.The Secretary of State told&nbsp;Breitbart that 'we know it began in Wuhan, but we don't know from where or from whom, and those are important things.'He had previously said that there was 'enormous evidence' and a 'significant amount of evidence' that the virus originated in a lab.&nbsp; In her study, Ms Yan discounts the theory that coronavirus evolved in the wild and was then transferred to humans, claiming it 'lacks substantial support'.'SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring virus,' she wrote.'The evidence shows that [the virus] should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone.'She alleges the virus 'should' have been built using stores of these bat viruses, of which she claims samples are kept in Hong Kong and China.Ms Yan also alleges that her work shows the virus could be built in just six months in the report's abstract, but she does not return to the subject later in the paper.Dr Andrew Preston, an expert in microbial pathogenesis at the University of Bath, blasted her report as being 'reminiscent of a conspiracy theory'.&nbsp;'The author's affiliation is the Rule of Law Society and Rule of Law Foundation, New York,' he said.'On their website the vision of this organisation is 'to permit the people of China to live under a national system based on the rule of law, independent of the political system of the People's Republic of China' ...'Given the unsubstantiated claims in the publication, which has not been peer reviewed, the report cannot be viewed with any credibility as it stands.' Dr Michael Head, a global health expert at the University of Southampton, said the conspiracy theory peddled by the report has been 'doing the rounds throughout the pandemic'.'Ultimately, it could be damaging to public health if reported non-critically without looking at the wider evidence,' he said.'If people are exposed to and then believe conspiracy theories, this will likely have a negative impact on efforts to keep Covid-19 cases low and thus there will be more deaths and illness than there needs to be.'The genomics of the virus have been disentangled previously, for example a Nature peer-reviewed paper where they state 'Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory constructed or a purposefully manipulated virus'.'Other evidence also shows that this type of coronavirus has existed in bats for decades. This new manuscript is not peer reviewed and does not obviously offer any data that overrides previous research.'&nbsp;&nbsp;Ms Yan wrote in her paper that theories the virus is from nature and the meat market in Wuhan are a 'smoke screen', alleging she was told this by CDC scientists working in China.She has previously accused Beijing of lying about when it learned of the killer infection and engaging in an extensive cover-up.Ms Yan claims she fled to Hong Kong and escaped to America in April to 'raise awareness' of the pandemic. She claims she was working at the Hong Kong School of Public Health, a reference laboratory for the World Health Organisation, but she was cut off after trying to alert people to human-to-human transmission of the virus in December.She also claims that before leaving China her information was wiped from the Government database.The lab has denied that Ms Yan ever 'conducted any research on human-to-human transmission' and said her assertions have 'no scientific basis'.&nbsp;Bannon, 66, was arrested on Guo's yacht off the coast of Connecticut on August 20.In an indictment with three others, Bannon is charged with unlawfully raising more than $25 million for the We Build The Wall campaign.&nbsp;He pleaded not guilty and was bailed.&nbsp;As he left the courthouse, he shouted: 'This entire fiasco is to stop people who want to build the wall.'&nbsp;Share what you thinkThe comments below have not been moderated.The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.We are no longer accepting comments on this article.Published by Associated Newspapers LtdPart of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday &amp; Metro Media Group&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;Tuesday, Sep 13th 2022| 428A Chinese defector's study claiming that Covid-19 was manufactured in a lab was published by groups founded by former Trump strategist Steve Bannon and a billionaire Beijing exile.&nbsp;The scientific paper, which has not been peer-reviewed, claims the disease was built by merging the genetic material of two bat coronaviruses and that a spike protein was edited to enhance its ability to latch onto human cells.Scientists have slammed the report published on Monday as 'unsubstantiated' and said it 'cannot be given any credibility.'The study was produced by the...

public

Ross Ibbetson

For the latest updates on breaking news visit our website: http://dailymail.co.uk 🇬🇧

Study claiming covid came from lab published by Bannon-linked groups

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS