Name: US Media Can't Think How to Fight Fires Without $1-an-Hour Prison Labor - FAIR
Brand: fair.org
SKU: fair-org-27
Availability: OnlineOnly

critic

US Media Can't Think How to Fight Fires Without $1-an-Hour Prison Labor - FAIR

preview

&nbsp;InsiderAs a historic set of wildfires sweeps across California, sparked by lightning and stoked by record heat and drought resulting from climate change (Mercury News, ; Scientific American, ), many news outlets have drawn readers’ attention to an additional problem the state faces in fighting the fires: shortages of the prison labor that it normally relies on for firefighting crews.The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection — known as Cal Fire — “has roughly half as many inmate fire crews than it originally had to work during the most dangerous part of wildfire season,” thanks to prison quarantines and Covid-related early-release programs, reported CNBC (), and “rotating out firefighters isn’t an easy option because there’s already a significant shortage of workers available.” Insider () wrote that “the coronavirus pandemic is creating a shortage of inmate fire crews to battle the wildfires,” noting that California has “relied on incarcerated firefighters as its primary ‘hand crews’ since the 1940s.” The New York Times () declared that losing inmate labor “has been the difference between having the manpower to save homes from wildfires — or not,” and that “hiring firefighters to replace them, especially given the difficult work involved, would challenge a state already strapped for cash.”It’s a gripping story, certainly, of a state unable to respond sufficiently to one disaster because of steps taken to ward off another. But the coverage all danced around a key problem with framing this as a labor shortage: There are plenty of workers available in a state with — no doubt including many of the fire-trained inmate workers who were released early by Gov. Gavin Newsom in order to free them from the threat of getting sick in California’s . The main difference: Unlike prison laborers, regular citizens have to be paid more than pittance wages.In California, inmates at state prisons are allowed to apply to work at “conservation camps” for a base rate of $5.12 per day, plus an additional $1 an hour when out fighting fires. As the Sacramento Bee () reports, most are assigned to hand crews that typically perform “the critically important and dangerous job of using chainsaws and hand tools to cut firelines around properties and neighborhoods during wildfires.”Inmate fire crews have been the norm in California since the 1940s (LA Times, ), part of a long history of local governments using prison labor to perform vital public services. Pacific Standard () recounted the practice’s origins:When Congress passed the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution in 1865, ending slavery, it left open a loophole: Involuntary servitude could continue as “punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.” This effectively legalized slavery among imprisoned populations, allowing former slaveholders in the South to implement a convict lease system, contracting prisoners out to private firms. Even abolitionists were willing to sign on, due to their reliance on prison labor. African-American inmates were “leased—literally, contracted out—to businessmen, planters, and corporations in one of the harshest and most exploitative labor systems known in American history,” writes Matthew Mancini in his book .Convict leasing was formally outlawed in 1941, but the principle of using inmate labor to save money continues to this day. The estimated cost savings to the state of California from inmate firefighting alone is as much as $100 million a year (Democracy Now!, ).And using workers who are paid only dollars a day drives down wages for the non-incarcerated as well. Factory owners have complained they can’t compete for government contracts against UNICOR (Vox, ), the government-owned company that employs inmates for “everything from manufacturing extension cords to operating dairy farms to recycling electronics” (Wired, ).&nbsp;The only quote the New York Times () uses from a critic of the inmate firefighting program is a&nbsp; union leader who suggests that prisoners are too scary to be used to fight fires.While California wildfire coverage gave a nod toward the “debate” around such practices, it generally limited any discussion to a side note before getting on to the main question of Won’t anyone think of the fires? The New York Times (), for instance, reported that the inmate labor shortage has “highlighted the state’s dependence on prisoners in its firefighting force,” which “to critics,” it said, is “a cheap and exploitative salve.”But most of the Times story focused on the experiences of inmate firefighters (“We took special pride in being able to actually save people’s homes”) and the value they provide, quoting a former corrections office at a fire camp as saying, “How do you justify releasing all these inmates in prime fire season with all these fires going on?” A spokesperson for Cal Fire followed, declaring inmate fire crews to be “absolutely imperative to our ability to create hand line and do arduous work on our fires.” No prison labor advocates were cited, with the only “critic” a single firefighter union leader who complained that the state has been illegally expanding the inmate work program.Rasheed Lockheart (featured on the Snap Judgment podcast—)One expert critic they might have consulted is Rasheed Lockheart, a formerly incarcerated California resident who for the last two years before his release from San Quentin Prison worked for the San Quentin Fire Department as a lead engineer on a fire engine, and as the lead on an ambulance crew. Lockheart, who works with , a group that promotes food justice for people transitioning from prison, says using incarcerated workers to fight fires isn’t the problem — it’s not paying them a decent wage to do so.“I don’t want to abolish the fire camps,” says Lockheart. But, he says, if prisoners are putting their lives on the line alongside fellow firefighters, “we should get equal pay, we shouldn’t be making a dollar an hour — I mean, there’s jobs inside the prison that get paid more than they get paid to be out there risking their lives.”And when push came to shove, California was willing to pay to hire firefighters. A Cal Fire spokesperson tells FAIR that the department has recently hired more than 800 seasonal workers, nearly making up for the roughly 1,000 inmates who are missing from the normal complement. But while this might seem to present an easy solution — just hire back the recently released inmates who are already trained in firefighting — Lockheart explains that there’s another obstacle that makes this unlikely.“I’m a city firefighter — my experience is mostly with municipal firefighting,” says Lockheart:The problem with that is, in order to do that, you must have EMT certifications. But with a felony on our records, we can’t get EMT certifications. And with the wildland firefighting crews, with certain felonies, a lot of departments won’t take guys on. There are ways to get in, but it’s hard and it’s a long road.Trained firefighters being good enough to work for nearly nothing, but ineligible to get real jobs, would seem to represent an even bigger irony — and a more important story — than California having to spend a few million dollars extra to fight two crises at once. But covering the wildfire story that way would require seeing it through the eyes of inmates, not of a government whose main concern is the inconvenience of having to pay people when you’re used to getting their work almost for free. That’s an , of course — but one would have hoped it wouldn’t still be guiding news coverage nearly 200 years later.&nbsp;Correction: An earlier version of this piece misidentified the group Rasheed Lockheart is affiliated with.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;What a peculiar system. The inmates do a necessary job and learn a skill—–and yet—when they leave prison—they have a necessary skill for fire work—and yet won’t be hired. So government, if they do their time, AND learn a skill–but are not able to preform that skill once their prison time is over—–Government, aren’t you then eternally making these workers jobless even though they have fire fighting skills? So the lesson becomes…Once a criminal, always a criminal? If there isn’t a law against this kind of discrimination—there should be!Equal pay? Why not. Of course, they’ll have to pay for their room and board like the free men have to. Nobody is forcing them. They can choose to stay in their cells. An out building on my farm was built by German POWs. They did the work for free. They didn’t want to sit around.This is a quote from the article…”One expert critic they might have consulted is Rasheed Lockheart, a formerly incarcerated California resident who for the last two years before his release from San Quentin Prison worked for the San Quentin Fire Department as a lead engineer on a fire engine, and as the lead on an ambulance crew.” This quote seems to contradict other parts of the story that imply the prisoners cannot get work as EMT’s or as firefighters. Is the idea here that an inmate can be an ambulance driver, but not an EMT, is there such a distinction?Alessandro, it seems likely to me that Mr. Lockheart must have passed the state EMT exam after his release from prison. From what I recall all members of an ambulance crew, usually two people, have passed state exams. The exam itself seems the barrier. Most emergency care can be performed absent an exam. Lockheart is also speaking about the difference between fighting fire in a state’s interior and working with city fire departments. In private ambulance companies EMTs collect insurance numbers and social security numbers, along with rudimentary care, and many more administrative workers are involved in the endless act of billing. I recall speaking with people at car accident sites who didn’t want to be transported to hospital because of the cost.When you find a way to profit from punishment you incentivize it and then you seek to increase it. This is why punishing criminals should always be a burden on society.CVHOAX.COMCalifornia could also build under zoning laws that encourage dense cities and discourage sprawlWell, I think you are on the right side of this one just like you are on the stadium issues. Cheers, VictorThis site uses Akismet to reduce spam. .FAIR is the national progressive media watchdog group, challenging corporate media bias, spin and misinformation. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. We expose neglected news stories and defend working journalists when they are muzzled. As a progressive group, we believe that structural reform is ultimately needed to break up the dominant media conglomerates, establish independent public broadcasting and promote strong non-profit sources of information.Fairness &amp; Accuracy In Reporting124 W. 30th Street, Suite 201New York, NY 10001Tel: 212-633-6700We rely on your support to keep running. Please consider donating.XThis work is licensed under a License.

&nbsp;InsiderAs a historic set of wildfires sweeps across California, sparked by lightning and stoked by record heat and drought resulting from climate change (Mercury News, ; Scientific American, ), many news outlets have drawn readers’ attention to an additional problem the state faces in fighting the fires: shortages of the prison labor that it normally relies on for firefighting crews.The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection — known as Cal Fire — “has roughly half as many inmate fire crews than it originally had to work during the most dangerous part of wildfire...

public

Neil deMause

Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, holding corporate media accountable for distortions & omissions since 1986. http://mastodon.world/@FAIR

US Media Can't Think How to Fight Fires Without $1-an-Hour Prison Labor - FAIR

No article scores yet.

CRITIC REVIEWS

PUBLIC REVIEWS